Search Results for "UAPA"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "UAPA"

123 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 123 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Grants Bail to Accused in NIA Case for Alleged ISIS Propaganda — Cites Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Terrorist Act Under UAPA. Sharing of ISIS Content and Creation of WhatsApp Group 'Black Soldiers' Does Not Warrant Denial of Bail Under Section 43D(5) of UAPA.

19 Jan 2026

The appellant, A.Alfasith, was arrested by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) in connection with RC No.03/2024/NIA/CHE for alleged offences under...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Grants Bail to UAPA Accused After 5 Years of Pre-Trial Detention, Upholding Right to Speedy Trial Under Article 21. The Court held that prolonged incarceration without trial conclusion infringes fundamental rights, and granted bail despite the seriousness of Naxalite-related charges.

14 Feb 2025

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Tapas Kumar Palit, who was in custody as an undertrial prisoner since 24 March 2020 in connection with a case ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Default Bail Appeals in UAPA Case — Extension of Investigation Time Valid Despite Procedural Irregularities. Supreme Court Had Restored Extension Order, Charge-Sheet Filed Within Extended Period, Hence No Indefeasible Right to Default Bail Under Section 167(2) CrPC.

26 Jul 2024

The case involves two criminal appeals challenging a common order dated 28th June 2022 passed by the learned Special Judge, NIA, Greater Mumbai, rejec...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Arrest Under PML Act — Validity of Arrest Under Section 19 PML Act Must Be Examined by Trial Court at Remand Stage

12 Jul 2024

The Supreme Court heard an appeal by Arvind Kejriwal challenging his arrest by the Directorate of Enforcement (DoE) under Section 19 of the Prevention...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in NIA Case Citing Delay in Trial and No Prima Facie Evidence of Terrorist Act. The court held that the bar under Section 43D(5) of UAPA is not absolute and can be relaxed when the right to speedy trial under Article 21 is violated, and the accused has been in custody for over two years without trial.

29 May 2023

The appellant, Imran Ahmed, was arrested in connection with Spl.C.C.No.141/2021 for offences under Sections 16, 18, 20 of the Unlawful Activities (Pre...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in NIA Case Involving IED Blast and MCOC Act — Appellant Enlarged on Bail Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Conspiracy and Long Incarceration. The court held that the twin conditions under Section 43D(5) of UAPA and Section 21(4) of MCOC Act do not bar bail if no prima facie case is made out, and prolonged incarceration without trial violates Article 21.

15 Jul 2022

The appellant, Satyanarayana Rani, aged 72, was arrested on 11 June 2019 in connection with an IED blast that occurred on 1 May 2019 under a bridge on...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Bail for Accused in UAPA Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence and Prolonged Incarceration. Court Holds That Statutory Restrictions Under Section 43D(5) of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 Do Not Oust Constitutional Courts' Power to Grant Bail Based on Fundamental Rights Violations and Trial Delays.

28 Oct 2021

The Supreme Court dealt with two criminal appeals arising from a Kerala High Court judgment concerning bail granted to accused persons under the Unlaw...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in NIA Case Under UAPA and IPC — No Prima Facie Evidence of Conspiracy or Terrorist Act. The court held that the bar under Section 43D(5) of UAPA does not apply when the accusations are not prima facie true, and the appellant's role was not clearly established in the charge sheet.

2 Aug 2019

The appellant, Asim Shariff, accused No.5, filed a criminal appeal under Section 21 of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008, challenging the or...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Holding That Bail in Original FIR Does Not Cover Newly Added UAPA Offences and NIA Re-Registration Is Not a Second FIR. The court ruled that the appellant must seek fresh bail for offences under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, and that the NIA's re-registration and further investigation were lawful.

26 Apr 2019

The appellant, Pradeep Ram, was initially arrested in connection with FIR No. 02/2016 registered at Police Station Tandwa for offences under Sections ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Bail to Accused in Terror Funding Case Under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 — High Court Order Set Aside for Erroneous Application of Section 43D(5) Bar. The Court held that the bar under Section 43D(5) applies when the court finds a prima facie case, and the High Court's approach was contrary to law.

1 Mar 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) against the Delhi High Court's order granting bail to Zahoor Ahm...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)