Search Results for "Trade Mark Rectification"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Trade Mark Rectification"

97 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 97 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Contempt Application Against Respondent for Willful Breach of Injunction Order in Trademark Infringement Suit. Use of 'NOVA MINI' mark and similar artistic work held to be deceptively similar to registered trademark 'NOVA' and artistic work, constituting contempt under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC.

13 Jul 2026

The applicant, Dr. Ashok M. Bhat, is the registered proprietor of the trademark 'NOVA' and an artistic work used for brilliantine hair cream. In 2007,...

High Court

Trademark Dispute: Examination of Ex-Parte Injunction and Material Disclosure Obligations.

25 Oct 2024

The case concerns a trademark dispute where Dharampal Satyapal Foods Ltd., the defendant, sought to vacate an ex-parte injunction granted to Parle Pro...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Trademark Dispute Over 'Anna' for South Indian Eateries - Prior User Fails to Establish Infringement Due to Generic Nature of Mark. The court held that the word 'Anna' is generic and cannot be exclusively appropriated, rejecting the claim of trademark infringement and passing off under the Trademarks Act, 1999.

30 Nov 2023

The dispute arose between two eatery owners in Pune over the use of the word 'Anna' in their restaurant names. The Appellant-Plaintiff, Shantapa alias...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case — 'Cothagiri' Mark Deceptively Similar to 'Cothas'. Defendant restrained from using mark 'cothagiri' for coffee products as it is phonetically and structurally similar to plaintiff's registered trademark 'Cothas'.

14 Sep 2016

The case involves a trademark infringement dispute between two coffee companies. The appellant, M/s Avighna Coffee Pvt. Ltd., was the defendant in the...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Injunction Against Defendant in Trademark Infringement Case — 'Cothagiri' Mark Deceptively Similar to 'Cothas'. Court Restrains Defendant from Using Mark 'Cothagiri' for Coffee Products, Finding Prima Facie Case of Passing Off Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

14 Sep 2016

The case involves a trademark dispute between M/s. Cothas Coffee Co. (plaintiff/respondent) and M/s. Avighna Coffee Pvt. Ltd. (defendant/appellant). T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to IPAB Order Rejecting Additional Documents in Trade Mark Dispute Over 'Laxman Rekha'. Court Held That IPAB's Discretion to Refuse Additional Evidence at Appellate Stage Was Not Shown to Be Perverse or Unreasonable.

26 Oct 2010

The petitioner, Sudhir Bhatia, trading as M/s V. Bhatia International, and respondent No.3, Midas Hygiene Industries Pvt. Ltd., were involved in a dis...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — No Deceptive Similarity Between 'Palm Grove' and 'Royal Palms' Hotels. Plaintiff's use of 'Palm Grove' always in combination with 'Ramada' and delay disentitled it to interim relief.

18 Apr 2016

The Plaintiff, Palm Grove Beach Hotels Pvt. Ltd., owned and operated a mid-range hotel in Juhu, Mumbai, under the name 'Ramada Plaza Palm Grove' (prev...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — No Deceptive Similarity Between STIMULIV and STIMULET for Different Pharmaceutical Products. The court held that the mark 'STIMULET' used for an allopathic breast cancer drug does not infringe the registered mark 'STIMULIV' used for Ayurvedic liver medicines due to differences in nature, trade channels, and customers under Section 29(2) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

20 Jan 2023

The case involves a trademark infringement and passing off dispute between two pharmaceutical companies. The appellant, Corona Remedies Private Limite...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Writ Petition Against IPAB Order Expunging Copyright Registration for Non-Compliance with Rule 16(3) of Copyright Rules, 1958. Mandatory Notice Requirement Under Rule 16(3) Not Met When Petitioner Had Constructive Knowledge of Respondent’s Interest; Ex Parte Adjudication Upheld Due to Lack of Prejudice.

28 Oct 2021

The dispute concerned copyright registration for artistic work and package designs used in tea trading. The petitioner, a proprietary concern, obtaine...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction Against Defendant for Infringing Registered Trade Mark 'Indian Express' in Devnagari Script. The Court held that use of the mark in Devnagari script constitutes infringement and passing off, rejecting the defence of honest concurrent use.

23 Oct 2015

The Plaintiffs, The Indian Express Limited and Indian Express Newspapers (Mumbai) Ltd., are the owners and proprietors of the well-known 'Indian Expre...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)