Search Results for "Suspension pending enquiry"

576 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 576 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Service Matter - Suspension Period Treatment. Disciplinary Authority Must Pass Speaking Order Under Rule 4(4) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1979.

The petitioner, Shivaji Baburao Avhad, a retired government servant, joined the Sales Tax Department as a Clerk in 1981. In 2001, he was prosecuted fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Award Denying Subsistence Allowance for Failure to Mark Attendance During Suspension. Suspended Employee Not Required to Attend Factory Daily for Subsistence Allowance Under Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946.

The petitioner, M/s. Hindustan Level Employees Union, challenged an Award dated 13.08.2014 which rejected a Reference concerning denial of subsistence...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeal Against Grant of Temporary Injunction Restraining a Society from Interfering with Duties of its Associate Secretary. The dispute involved the validity of a suspension order issued by a society registered under the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960.

The dispute originated from a suspension order dated 25.04.2023 issued by the Young Men's Christian Association (YMCA), a society registered under the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Cross Appeals in Service Dispute Over Suspension and Terminal Benefits of Deceased Employee. The court held that salary during suspension is not payable if departmental enquiry is not completed, but provident fund and gratuity are statutory entitlements.

The case involves cross appeals arising from a judgment and decree dated 30.09.1992 in Special Civil Suit No. 102 of 1992. The plaintiffs, heirs of Di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Management's Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Suspension and Deduction Upheld. Disciplinary action and voluntary deduction under settlement were valid, not constituting unfair labour practice under Items 9 and 10 of Schedule IV of MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Vivekanand Rugnalaya, Latur, a hospital management, challenged the judgment and order dated 13/11/2013 of the Industrial Court, Latur,...