Search Results for "Seniority"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "Seniority"

974 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 974 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Temporary AEEs in Panchayat Raj Department — Quashes High Court Order Striking Down Regularization G.O.M. No. 262. Seniority of Pre-1994 Appointees Must Be Counted from Initial Appointment Date, Not Below Later Recruits.

12 Feb 2025

The case involves appeals by temporary Assistant Executive Engineers (AEEs) appointed between 1990-1992 in the Panchayat Raj Department of Andhra Prad...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Site Allotment by Mysore Urban Development Authority — Petitioner Failed to Demonstrate Any Legal Right or Violation of Principles of Natural Justice. The Court Held That the Allotment Process Was Conducted in Accordance with the Applicable Rules and Regulations, and No Interference Was Warranted Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.

31 Oct 2023

The petitioner, C.N. Balasubramanyam, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Judgment Granting Seniority to Ad Hoc Employees Over Regular Appointees in Subordinate Judiciary. Seniority of substantively appointed Lower Division Clerks from 1987 prevails as interim court order protecting ad hoc employees was limited to different panel of candidates and not applicable to regular appointees.

8 Dec 2021

The appeal arose from a dispute over seniority between two groups of Lower Division Clerks (LDCs) in the ministerial cadre of Delhi's subordinate judi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Direct Recruit Deputy Collectors and State of Uttarakhand in Seniority Dispute. Promotee Deputy Collectors Cannot Claim Seniority from Ad Hoc Appointment Date as Appointments Were Not in Accordance with Rules Under Uttaranchal Civil Services (Executive Branch) Rules, 2005.

14 Feb 2020

The Supreme Court heard a batch of civil appeals arising from a seniority dispute between direct recruit and promotee Deputy Collectors in the State o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Seniority Dispute of Absorbed Deputationist. Absorption on Own Request with Specific Conditions Precludes Claim for Seniority from Deputation Date.

5 Feb 2020

The case involves a dispute over seniority between the appellant, Govinda Chandra Tiria, and the respondent, Sibaji Charan Panda, both Lower Division ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in CRPF Seniority Dispute — Direct Recruits Rank Senior to Promotees. Date of Allotment to Units Constitutes Date of Appointment Under Rule 8(e) of CRPF Rules, 1955.

27 Aug 2019

The Supreme Court allowed appeals by direct recruit Sub Inspectors (General Duty) of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) and the Union of India ag...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Service Promotion Dispute — Continuous Service Under Recruitment Rules Must Be Actual Service, Not Deemed Date. The Court held that the deemed date of promotion under Seniority Rules cannot be treated as actual continuous service for eligibility under Recruitment Rules, quashing the promotion of Respondent No. 3 to Section Officer.

10 May 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Girish Kumar against the judgment of the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) which had upheld the promo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Senior Clerk Challenging Transfer Order, Quashes Appellate Authority's Dismissal of Appeal for Non-Compliance with Natural Justice and Transfer Guidelines. The court held that the appellate authority's order was cryptic and lacked reasoning, failing to consider the petitioner's seniority and transfer policy, and directed a fresh hearing.

6 Oct 2010

The petitioner, Prakash Bhaurao Parmeshwar, was appointed as a Junior Clerk on 19 June 1991 in the school run by respondent no.4 Society, Unnati Shiks...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Claim for Seniority in CGHS Promotion Dispute. Seniority Determined by Date of Regular Appointment, Not Ad Hoc Promotion, Under Central Civil Services Rules.

17 Mar 2006

The petitioner, Arjun Sopan Gaikwad, was appointed as a Lower Division Clerk on 16 October 1978 and promoted to Upper Division Clerk on 9 April 1984. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Seniority List of Section Supervisors in EPFO. Seniority Determined by Date of Promotion, Not by Date of Eligibility, Upheld by CAT.

13 Jan 2005

The petitioners, Smt. L.M. Mahadik and Shri S.D. Jagtap, filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order of ...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)