Search Results for "Section 395 IPC"

236 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 236 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Complainant's Revision in Cheating and Forgery Case — Restores Magistrate's Order Issuing Process. Held that the Sessions Court erred in quashing process at the initial stage as there was a prima facie case under Sections 420, 465, 467, 471, 403 read with 120B IPC.

The case involves a Criminal Revision Application filed by the original complainant, Rajeev Sawhney, challenging an order dated 13.8.2008 passed by th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against Conviction in Dacoity Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. The court held that the testimony of a single witness (PW8) without corroboration and unreliable identification cannot sustain a conviction under Section 395 IPC.

The case involves two criminal appeals arising from a common judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Bombay, in Sessions Case No.1505/99. The appel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Sentence for Rape of 5-Year-Old Girl. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f) IPC Sustained Based on Direct Eyewitness Testimony and Medical Evidence.

The appellant, Amir Nyamatkha Tadvi, was convicted by the 3rd Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon, for the offence of rape under Section 376(2)(...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Dacoity Case Due to Lack of Identification and Conspiracy Evidence. Acquittal of Accused Under Sections 120-B, 395, 397 IPC Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 11th May 1987 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, whereby ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dacoity Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Identification Parade Not Conducted and Recovery of Stolen Articles Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to an incident of dacoity that occurred on the night of 30th March 2001 at the house of the informant, Bharat Patil, in Sinnar, Nasi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder and Dacoity Based on Injured Eyewitness Testimony. Testimony of Injured Witness Held Sufficient for Conviction Under Sections 395, 396, 302, 397 IPC.

The appellant, Ajaykumar Sunilkumar Sharma, was convicted by the 11th Adhoc Addl. Sessions Judge, Dewree, Greater Bombay, in Sessions Case No.690 of 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Two Accused for Murder and Robbery in Truck Incident — Life Imprisonment Confirmed. The court held that the circumstantial evidence including last seen and recovery of stolen property established guilt under Sections 302, 392, 397 read with Section 34 IPC.

The case pertains to the conviction of two appellants, Palani @ Panni Wilswami Shetty (A1) and Kishor @ Kishya Raghunath Londhe (A2), by the Additiona...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Default Bail in UAPA Case: Exclusive Jurisdiction of Special Court for Extension of Investigation Period. The right to default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC accrues upon expiry of 90 days and is not defeated by subsequent filing of charge sheet if application was made before filing.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Bikramjit Singh, who was arrested in connection with a grenade attack at a Nirankari Bhawan in Amritsar on 18....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dacoity and House Trespass Case Due to Unreliable Identification. Identification by torchlight in darkness held insufficient to sustain conviction under Sections 452 and 395 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

The appellant, Indrabali Patai Rajbhar, was convicted by the Assistant Sessions Judge for Greater Bombay in Sessions Case No.524 of 2005 for offences ...