Search Results for "Section 32(2)"

290 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 290 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302, 506(2), 114 IPC and Section 135 Bombay Police Act set aside as sole eyewitness's evidence was inconsistent and not supported by medical or other evidence.

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the judgment and order of acquittal dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in POCSO Case — Prosecution Fails to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Acquittal of Accused for Offences Under Sections 363, 376, 506 IPC and Sections 4, 12 of POCSO Act Upheld Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration.

The State of Karnataka, through Bharamasagara Police Station, filed an appeal under Section 378(1) and (3) Cr.P.C. against the judgment of acquittal d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Abetment of Suicide Case — No Proximate Link Between Alleged Acts and Suicide. Allegations of harassment for dowry and demand for separate residence did not constitute abetment under Section 306 IPC as there was no direct or proximate nexus with the deceased's suicide.

The petitioner, Gulab s/o Yohan Pandit, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Tax-Free Status of Bagasse as Agricultural Produce Under Bombay Sales Tax Act. Sale of Bagasse, a Residue of Sugarcane, is Exempt from Tax Under Section 5 and Schedule Entry A-44 of the BST Act, 1959.

The case involves two Sales Tax References (No. 6 of 2009 and No. 68 of 2009) filed by the Commissioner of Sales Tax, Maharashtra State, against M/s. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Deduction Under Section 80P for Co-operative Bank's Interest Income from Advance Rent. Interest on advance rent paid for business premises is closely connected to banking business and eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which upheld the decision ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Husband in Abetment of Suicide Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Instigation or Cruelty. Allegations of Dowry Demand and Harassment Not Proven Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 306 and 498-A IPC.

The appellant, Bharat Pandurang Patil, was convicted by the 3rd Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Palghar, on 7th September 2006 in Sessions Case No.3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Revenue Tribunal Order in Land Transfer Dispute Involving Tribal Vendor. Court holds that sale by tribal to non-tribal prior to amendment of Section 36 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 was valid and petitioner's possession cannot be disturbed.

The petitioner, Nimba Bula Patil, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order dated 26.3.1991 passed by the Member, Maharashtra Revenue T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Association of Hospitals Against Dismissal of Writ Petition on Maintainability Grounds. The Court held that an association of hospitals has locus standi to challenge municipal tax exemption withdrawal orders affecting its members.

The appeal arose from a writ petition filed by the Association of Hospitals and another challenging communications from the Municipal Corporation of G...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Upheld. No substantial question of law arose as the appellant failed to prove title and possession over suit land.

The appellant, Bajirao Ramchandra Shelar, filed two second appeals (Second Appeal No.494 of 1990 and Second Appeal No.495 of 1990) against the judgmen...