Search Results for "Section 221 Contract Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Section 221 Contract Act"

307 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 307 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Certificate in Industrial Dispute Over Bonus Calculation. Court holds that Section 33-C(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 cannot be used to adjudicate disputed claims requiring determination of entitlement, and that the Authority exceeded its jurisdiction by computing bonus amounts without a prior adjudication of rights.

17 Nov 2025

The Bombay High Court allowed a writ petition filed by Pawan Hans Limited challenging an order dated 27 June 2022 passed by the Authority under Sectio...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition by Bangalore Development Authority for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Petitioners Sought Quashing of Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976.

11 Jul 2014

...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Writ Petition of Auction Purchaser Against DRAT Order Setting Aside Sale Under RDDBFI Act. Petitioner Challenges Order Directing Refund of Bid Amount, Alleging Fraudulent Agreement to Defeat Auction Sale.

18 Dec 2014

The petitioner, Smt. K. Padma, auction purchaser of a property in a bank recovery sale, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Consti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Conditionally Leaves to Defend for Guarantors in Summary Suit, Rejecting DRT Jurisdiction and IBC Moratorium Claims. A Non-Banking Financial Institution's Summary Suit Against Guarantors is Maintainable Under Order XXXVII CPC, and Section 14 IBC Moratorium Does Not Bar Proceedings Against Guarantors.

28 Nov 2017

The plaintiff, a non-banking financial institution, filed a summary suit under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 against two guarantor...

Tribunals

NCLAT Dismisses Appeal of Operational Creditor in IBC Section 9 Case — Pre-Existing Dispute Regarding Quality of Services Bars CIRP Initiation. The dispute regarding quality of transportation services raised by the Corporate Debtor prior to the demand notice constitutes a pre-existing dispute under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and the Adjudicating Authority correctly dismissed the application.

4 Sep 2024

The appeal was filed by Union Roadways Limited (Operational Creditor) against Ice Steel 1 Private Limited (Corporate Debtor) under Section 61 of the I...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Petitioners Seek Quashing of Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued Under the BDA Act and the Land Acquisition Act.

11 Jul 2014

A batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India came before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore, presided...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Reverses Acquittal for Dishonour of Cheque. Presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 stands unless rebutted by accused; failure to prove legally enforceable debt not established.

15 Sep 2006

This is an appeal by the complainant against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The complainant, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Stay of Suit Under Section 10 CPC — No Identity of Subject Matter Between Two Suits. The court held that a suit for dissolution of partnership and accounts is not directly and substantially the same as a suit for induction as a partner and injunction, and therefore Section 10 CPC does not apply.

23 Dec 2005

The petitioners, M/s. Sadguru Constructions and another, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 6.10.2005 passed by the 8th Joint Civil Judg...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Validity of Arbitration Reference and Anti-Suit Injunction in Wind Turbine Technology Licensing Dispute. The Core Issue Revolves Around Whether an Unincorporated IPLA Constitutes a Binding Arbitration Agreement Under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

5 Oct 2012

The dispute arose from a joint venture between Enercon (India) Ltd. and its directors (Petitioners) and Enercon GmbH and Wobben Properties GmbH (Respo...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Filed by Landowners Against Land Acquisition for BDA Layout. Notifications Issued Under Sections 17 and 19 of BDA Act Challenged.

11 Jul 2014

...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)