Search Results for "School Birth Certificate"

861 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 861 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Premature Retirement Based on Date of Birth Discrepancy. Petitioner's claim of correct date of birth as 1st June 1950 rejected as service record showed 18th March 1947 and no application for correction was made within reasonable time.

The petitioner, Yashwant G. Tambe, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging his premature retirement from the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition in Date of Birth Correction Case — Employee Failed to Prove Correct Date of Birth. Labour Court and Industrial Court Orders Set Aside as Employee Did Not Challenge Employer's Evidence and Delay in Raising Dispute Was Fatal.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Farming Corporation Ltd., challenged the common judgment of the Labour Court and the order of the Industrial Court, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Sets Aside Conviction Under Section 6 of POCSO Act for Failure to Prove Victim's Minority. Non-Production of School Birth Certificate Renders Ossification Test Insufficient Under Mandatory Age Determination Procedure.

Background: The present appeal arose from the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Sangli, in Special Case (POCSO) No.61/2016, whereby the appel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging CGIT Award Allowing Correction of Employee's Date of Birth. Delay of Eight Years in Filing Writ Petition and Failure to Produce Evidence Justified Tribunal's Order.

The case involves a challenge by the Board of Trustees of Port of Mumbai (Petitioner) against an award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Age Determination in Murder Case. Court Upholds Sessions Judge's Finding That Appellant Was Above 18 Years Based on Birth Certificate Over School Certificate Under Rule 12 of Juvenile Justice Rules, 2007.

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals challenging the Punjab & Haryana High Court's order dismissing as withdrawn the appellant's applications for addit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Act Case Due to Inadequate Age Proof and Inadmissible Evidence. Conviction Under Sections 6 of POCSO Act, 366 and 376 of IPC Overturned

The appellant was convicted by the trial court for offences under Section 6 of POCSO Act read with Section 376 of IPC and Section 366 of IPC, involvin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Convicted Accused in Murder Case — Age Determination Issue Not Proven. Appellant failed to establish juvenility on date of offence despite claiming birth date of 6/7/1983, as evidence from school and birth records was inconsistent.

The appellant, Amit @ Bapu Nanasaheb Bhandwalkar, was convicted in a criminal case and filed Criminal Appeal No. 38 of 2005 before the Bombay High Cou...