Search Results for "Rule 33A"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Rule 33A"

108 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 108 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Petition Under Section 264 of Income Tax Act Despite Retrospective Amendment After Assessment Order. Commissioner Must Consider Retrospective Amendment as Law Deemed to Exist on Date of Assessment Order.

22 Dec 2014

The petitioner, Kalpesh M. Nagda, filed his return of income for Assessment Year 2003-2004 on 25 November 2003, declaring total income of Rs.48,22,312...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Maintainability of Individual Workmen's Complaints for Permanency Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. Industrial Court Dismissed Complaints Holding Recognised Union Had Exclusive Right to File Such Complaints, and High Court Finds Need for Factual Adjudication on Merits.

29 Jul 2005

The writ petitions arose from a common judgment of the Industrial Court, Pune, dated 13-3-1996, which dismissed 63 workmen's complaints seeking perman...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Trust Land Possession Suit — Civil Court Lacks Jurisdiction Without Certificate Under Section 88-B(2) of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. Suit by Trust for Possession of Tenanted Agricultural Land Barred in Absence of Certificate from Competent Authority.

20 Apr 2005

The case involves a Second Appeal filed by the original defendants against the judgment of the lower appellate court which decreed the suit for posses...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Arbitral Awards in Service Tax Reimbursement Dispute. Court Holds That Construction of Contractual Clause by Arbitrator Falls Within Arbitral Domain and Is Not Open to Challenge Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

14 Jun 2019

The case involves five appeals filed by Central Warehousing Corporation (the appellant) against a common judgment dated 18.02.2019 dismissing its arbi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Labour Court Order in Industrial Dispute — Petitioners Failed to Establish Employer-Employee Relationship. The Court upheld the Labour Court's finding that the petitioners were not workmen under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as they were engaged as independent contractors for distribution of newspapers.

30 Aug 2024

The judgment involves a batch of 20 writ petitions filed by individuals claiming to be workmen of Lokmat Media Private Limited. The petitioners, repre...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Labour Court Award in VSS Dispute — NMR Workers Found to Have Been Coerced into Voluntary Separation Scheme. The Court confirmed reinstatement with 70% back-wages under Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, finding no perversity in the concurrent findings of fact.

12 Sep 2019

The case arose from a dispute between the General Manager, Electrical Rengali Hydro Electric Project, Orissa (appellant) and 90 NMR workers (responden...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Election Petition for Non-Disclosure of Cause of Action in Mahim Constituency Dispute. Failure to disclose chargesheets in Form 26 affidavit does not constitute corrupt practice under Section 100(1)(b) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, as the alleged non-disclosure did not materially affect the election result.

7 Apr 2026

The case involves an Interim Application filed by Mahesh Baliram Sawant, the returned candidate from the Mahim Constituency in the 15th Maharashtra Le...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Tribunal's Order for Payment of Subsistence Allowance to Suspended Railway Employee. Employer's Failure to Pay Subsistence Allowance During Suspension Period Renders Subsequent Disciplinary Proceedings Invalid.

28 Jan 2005

The Union of India, through the Chief Workshop Manager of Central Railway, Parel, Mumbai, filed two writ petitions challenging orders of the Central G...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Challenging Labour Court's Finding on Majority Union. Membership Verification by Labour Court is Final and Binding on Employer and Rival Union.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a dispute between two trade unions, Akhil Dadra & Nagar Haveli Kamgar Sangh (appellant in LPA 197/2008) and Krantikari Kamgar Union ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Workers' Appeal in Contract Labour Dispute — IPCA Laboratories Held Liable as Principal Employer Under Contract Labour Act. The court held that the Labour Enforcement Officer's complaint under Section 22A of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 was maintainable and that the company was the principal employer, rejecting the company's challenge to the cognizance order.

23 Nov 2022

The case involves two Letters Patent Appeals arising from a common order in Writ Petition No. 2791 of 2009. The appellants in LPA No. 270 of 2009 are ...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)