Search Results for "Rule 28(6)"

425 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 425 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award Under Sections 46 and 47 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Dispute Arises from International Sale of Steel Coils Where Italian Company Sought to Enforce Award Against Indian Steel Manufacturer.

The case concerns a petition filed under Sections 46 and 47 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking enforcement of a foreign arbitral a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010306832010_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Factories Act for Vagueness of Complaint. Complaint Must Contain Specific Allegations Disclosing Offence; Documents Annexed Cannot Cure Defect Under Section 482 CrPC.

The applicants, the Manager and General Manager of a fertilizer manufacturing company, Zuari Industries Limited, approached the Bombay High Court unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Inaction on GST Registration Cancellation Application — Failure to Consider Application Within Statutory Period Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Section 29 of CGST Act, 2017.

The petitioner, Heritage Lifestyles and Developers Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petition before...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award in Joint Venture Dispute. Petition Seeks Enforcement Under Section 48 of Arbitration Act; Allegations Include Breach of JVA and Conflict of Interest.

The petitioner, an Italian company engaged in cable manufacturing, entered into a Joint Venture Agreement dated 19th January 2010 with the respondents...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal by Union of India in Army Dismissal Case Due to Procedural Irregularity. Summary Court Martial Conducted Without Following Mandatory Procedure Under Army Rules 22-24 and Section 80 of Army Act, 1950 Renders Dismissal Void.

The Union of India, Ministry of Defence, and other appellants challenged an order dated 5th September 2001 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Kar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act — Reassessment Based on Mere Change of Opinion Invalid as Full Disclosure Was Made During Original Assessment.

The petitioner, Plus Paper Food Pac Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging a notice dated 18.11.2013 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.4520 OF 2014

The writ petitions challenged the constitutional validity and propriety of a notification dated January 29, 2014, issued by the Finance Department of ...