Search Results for "Rehabilitation and Resettlement Policy"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Rehabilitation and Resettlement Policy"

144 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 144 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Tamil Nadu Land Acquisition Acts in Challenge Based on Repugnancy to Central Act of 2013. Presidential Assent Under Article 254(2) Protects State Enactments from Being Void Despite Repugnancy to the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

9 May 2023

The case involves a challenge to the validity of three Tamil Nadu State Acts: the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Harijan Welfare Schemes Act, 1978...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Writ Petitions Seeking Declaration of Lapse of Land Acquisition Proceedings Under Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013. Petitioners Challenge Notifications and Awards Under Bangalore Development Authority Act Asserting Lapse Under Section 24 of 2013 Act.

10 Mar 2016

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a batch of writ petitions filed between 2013 and 2015 by multiple landowners against the State of Karna...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Petitioner Entitled to Higher Compensation Under Section 23(1-A) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for Delayed Possession. Landowner's Claim for Additional Amount for Period Between Notification and Possession Upheld.

5 Dec 2006

The petitioner, Bhausaheb Vishwanath Murkute, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Auran...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Writ Petitions Filed Under Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Petitioners Sought Declaration That 1977-78 BDA Land Acquisition Had Lapsed Due to Non-Taking of Possession or Non-Payment of Compensation.

14 Dec 2017

These three sets of writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Karnataka, all relating to the acquisition of land measuring seven acres in Sur...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows DDA's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Overturns High Court's Lapsing Declaration. Constitution Bench decision in Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal overrules earlier precedent, holding that Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act does not apply where possession has been taken but compensation not paid.

1 Jan 2023

The case involves a land acquisition dispute where the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) appealed against a High Court judgment that declared the acqu...

Supreme Court

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

5 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs State to Decide Representations of Forest Dwellers Under Forest Rights Act. Petitioners Sought Recognition of Forest Rights and Patta Under Sections 4(3), 4(5), 4(6) of Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006.

8 Feb 2016

The petitioners, twelve individuals claiming to be forest dwellers, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking directions to the State...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Regularization of Unauthorized Buildings in Navi Mumbai — Section 52A MRTP Act Does Not Apply to Lands Acquired for Public Purpose and Belonging to Planning Authority. The court held that the compounding provision under Section 52A of the MRTP Act, 1966 is not applicable to unauthorized constructions on lands acquired for public purpose and vested in the Planning Authority.

14 Aug 2018

The petitioners were residents of buildings constructed without development permission on lands acquired by the State Government for the satellite cit...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Appeals in Land Acquisition Cases Under National Highways Act, 1956. The Court Enhanced Compensation for Landowners and Directed Authorities to Pay Additional Amounts.

9 Jun 2025

...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition Challenging Demolition of Residential Structures Without Notice Under Gujarat Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 2012. Demolition Without Prior Notice and Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Article 300A of the Constitution.

16 Mar 2026

The petitioners, Kureshi Irfanbhai Mohammadsharifbhai and others, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India bef...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)