Search Results for "Project affected persons"

462 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 462 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Petitions Against Railway Eviction Notices -- Residents of Malad Fail to Prove Legal Right to Railway Land -- Eviction Upheld for Public Infrastructure Development

The judgment involved 25 connected writ petitions filed by residents of Malad, Mumbai, against eviction notices from the Western Railway Administratio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Equal Passing Criteria for Project Affected Persons in Government Recruitment -- Petitioner's Claim for Separate Treatment Under PAP Category Rejected

The Petitioner, a Project Affected Person, sought appointment in Group C cadre under the Project Affected Persons category after failing a recruitment...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Temporary AEEs in Panchayat Raj Department — Quashes High Court Order Striking Down Regularization G.O.M. No. 262. Seniority of Pre-1994 Appointees Must Be Counted from Initial Appointment Date, Not Below Later Recruits.

The case involves appeals by temporary Assistant Executive Engineers (AEEs) appointed between 1990-1992 in the Panchayat Raj Department of Andhra Prad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Resettlement Project Due to Unexplained Delay of 12 Years. Petitioners' challenge to 2006 order of Divisional Commissioner fails as they failed to demonstrate diligence after personal hearing in 2005.

The petitioners, four individuals who are grandchildren of the original landowner Babasaheb Khadirsaheb Pirjade, filed a writ petition in 2018 challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation to Protect Land for Government Sports Complex at Navi Mumbai. CIDCO's commercial allotment of land earmarked for sports complex quashed; State Government's decision to shift complex to remote location set aside.

The Bombay High Court was hearing a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, challenging the action...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Land Acquisition Case for MRTS Project — High Court Direction for Alternate Site Quashed. Court holds that once acquisition is complete and possession taken, no direction for alternate site can be issued under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case involves appeals by the State of Tamil Nadu against a common judgment of the Madras High Court directing allotment of alternate land to priva...