Search Results for "Prison Rules 1959"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...

Search Results for "Prison Rules 1959"

104 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 104 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Parole Plea of TADA Convict Due to Specific Bar Under Maharashtra Prison Rules. Rule 4(13) read with Rule 19 of the Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959 disqualifies prisoners convicted under TADA from regular parole, and the Supreme Court's decision in Asfaq v. State of Rajasthan is distinguishable as it did not involve similar state-specific rules.

2 Dec 2022

The petitioner, Mo. Hasan Mehndi Hasan Sheikh, a convict serving life imprisonment at Central Jail, Amravati, was convicted for various offences inclu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Parole to Life Convict in COVID-19 Parole Case Due to Practical Construction of Rule. Condition of Two Prior Releases Cannot Be Applied Pedantically When Purpose Was Prison Decongestion Under Rule 19(1)(C) of Maharashtra Prisons (Mumbai Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959.

10 Mar 2021

The petitioner, Ayyaz Khan Zabaz Khan, a life convict under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, filed a criminal writ petition challenging the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Parole to Life Convict Despite Police Objection Based on Past Good Conduct. The court held that parole is a statutory right and rejection based on vague apprehension of absconding without material is unsustainable under Rule 19 of the Maharashtra Prisons (Mumbai Furlough and Parole) Rules.

3 Dec 2019

The petitioner, Hariom Vijay Pande, a life convict undergoing imprisonment since 2010 for an offence under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Ind...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Emergency Parole to Convict in POCSO and Rape Case for Father's Funeral. Rejection of Parole Solely on Ground of Heinous Offence Without Adverse Report Held Arbitrary Under Rule 19(1) of Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959.

3 Nov 2017

The petitioner, Baburao Marotrao Dakhore, was convicted by the Learned Sessions Court, Hingoli for offences punishable under Section 376(2)(H)(I)(N) o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Furlough to Convict Despite Pending Appeal, Emphasizing Furlough as a Right. Rejection on Ground of Adverse Police Report Without Considering Conduct and Statutory Criteria Held Unsustainable Under Maharashtra Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959.

13 Oct 2017

The petitioner, Dinesh Sahebrao Kadam, a convict lodged in Central Prison, Aurangabad, filed a Criminal Writ Petition challenging the order dated 20th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Furlough Petition for Convict Under Sections 392, 395 IPC Due to Statutory Bar and Past Misconduct. Rule 4(2) of Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959 prohibits furlough for prisoners convicted of offences under Sections 392 to 402 IPC, regardless of whether sentence for those offences has been served.

12 Apr 2017

The petitioner, Jalindarsingh Ajitsingh Kalyani, a prisoner at Kolhapur Central Prison, filed a Criminal Writ Petition through jail challenging the re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Furlough to Life Convict Despite Pending Appeal, Emphasizing Rehabilitation. Pendency of appeal is not a bar to grant of furlough under the Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959.

14 Sep 2016

The petitioner, Gururaj Bhimappa Barikai, was a life convict undergoing imprisonment for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Furlough to Convict in Terrorist Crime Case Due to Non-Retrospective Application of Prison Rules. Sub Rule (13) of Rule 4 of Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959 Cannot Be Applied to Offences Committed Before Its Enactment on 23.02.2012.

25 Aug 2014

The petitioner, Abdul Gani Ismail Turk, was convicted in the 1993 Mumbai Serial Bomb Blast case and sentenced to death by the TADA Court. The Supreme ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Post Facto Sanction of Furlough Extension for Convict in Murder Case Due to Mother's Illness. Life Convict's Absence from 23.9.2009 to 30.9.2009 Treated as Furlough Leave Extension on Humanitarian Grounds Under Prison Rules.

18 Jan 2010

The petitioner, Abdul Saim, a life convict under Section 302 IPC, was undergoing sentence at Open Prison, Paithan. He applied for furlough leave to me...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Parole Leave to Convict in Bombay Bomb Blast Case Despite Adverse Police Report — Prior Furlough Surrender and Good Conduct Considered. The court set aside the Divisional Commissioner's order rejecting parole, holding that the petitioner's history of timely surrender during previous releases negated the police apprehension.

15 Jan 2010

The petitioner, Mohammed Parvez Zulfikar Qureshi, a convict in the Bombay Bomb Blast case sentenced to life imprisonment under TADA (P) Act, 1987, cha...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)