Search Results for "Physical delivery"

845 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 845 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Valuation of Physician's Free Samples Under Central Excise Act. Free samples of medicines are excisable goods and must be valued under Rule 4 of Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000 based on price of comparable goods sold in the market.

The petitioners, Indian Drugs Manufacturer's Association and M/s. Emil Pharmaceuticals Industries Pvt. Ltd., challenged Circular No. 813 dated 25/4/20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Dismissal of Interim Injunction in Share Dispute Case. Court Restrains Transfer of Shares Allegedly Misappropriated Pending Suit, Holding That a Prima Facie Case of Fraud and Breach of Trust Was Made Out.

The appellant, Pushpanjali Tie Up Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit alleging that respondent No.1, Renudevi Choudhary, and respondent No.2, Ekta Choudhary (her ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Defendants' Second Appeal in Property Possession Suit Based on Oral Gift (Hiba) Under Muslim Personal Law. Concurrent Findings of Fact Regarding Valid Oral Gift and Father's Admission in Written Statement Upheld; No Substantial Question of Law Arises.

The dispute centered on ownership and possession of a property within a family, where the plaintiff, a son, claimed that his father had made an oral g...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Agent of Vessel Liable as Owner for Port Charges Under Major Port Trusts Act. Court Interprets Section 2(o) to Include Agent, Following Supreme Court Precedent, and Finds Defendants Liable for Deficit After Consignment Sale.

The Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay, a statutory corporation, filed a suit for recovery of Rs 3,21,369.45 along with interest, being the defic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Possession Held Validly Taken Despite Existence of Structures. Panchnama and Rapat Sufficient to Constitute Taking of Possession Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The State of Haryana appealed against the High Court's judgment that declared the acquisition of the respondent's land as lapsed under Section 24(2) o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Acquittal in Criminal Trespass Case, Holding Possession of Vacant Land and Intention to Annoy Are Sufficient. Supreme Court Rules that Complainant’s Physical Presence at Time of Trespass is Not Required Under Sections 441/447 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.

This appeal by special leave arose from a judgment of the Calcutta High Court in Criminal Revision No. 188 of 1966, which had acquitted the respondent...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Execution Proceedings — Possessory Title Not Required for Restoration Under Order XXI Rules 98-100 CPC. High Court erred in ordering restoration of possession without determining whether respondent had any right to possession under Order XXI Rules 98-100 CPC.

The Supreme Court considered an appeal against the judgment of the Calcutta High Court which had allowed the appeal of the respondent (Lt. Col. Nahar ...