Search Results for "Person Interested"

4188 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4188 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 324, 143, 147, 148 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to the murder of Nikhil More on the night of 17.08.2017 at Nashik. The prosecution alleged that the appellants (original accused Nos...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Land Allotment to Bhartiya Vidya Bhavan for School and Playground. Court upholds allotment as consistent with development plan reservation and public interest.

The case is a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Dr. Surendra Ramlal Tiwari and Trimurty Nagar Ground Bachav Kruti Samiti challenging the allot...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Land Acquisition Award for Violation of Section 5-A Hearing Right — Personal Hearing Not Afforded Despite Objections Filed by Owner. Denial of Personal Hearing Under Section 5-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Renders Acquisition Proceedings Invalid.

The petitioner, Talsons Real Estate Pvt. Ltd., owned land bearing Survey No.23/2/1 at Kondhwa Budruk, Taluka Haveli, District Pune. The State of Mahar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witness. Conviction under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was a close relative and evidence lacked corroboration.

The appellants, Annayappa @ Krishnappa and Babu, were convicted by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Bangalore Rural, for the murder of Munir...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Revokes Leave for Representative Suit in Tata Group Shareholder Dispute. Court holds that shareholders of different listed companies lack the same interest required under Order 1 Rule 8 CPC.

The Plaintiffs, claiming to be shareholders of various listed companies of the Tata Group, filed a representative suit under Order 1 Rule 8 of the Cod...