Search Results for "Parishad servant"

261 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 261 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Revision Application in Possession Dispute - Applicant Challenge to Decree Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act Fails - Trial Court's Order Restoring Possession Upheld

The High Court dismissed the Civil Revision Application filed by the Applicant-Defendant challenging the Trial Court's decree in Special Civil Suit No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal by Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation in Employee Liability Case — Holds That Government Servant Is Liable for Loss of Government Property Entrusted to Him Under Service Rules and Bombay Civil Services Rules, 1959

The respondent, Arvind Ramrao Chakole, was an engineer employed by the Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation. He was entrusted with a Pentex Aut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Commutation of Pension During Pendency of Criminal Proceedings. Rule 4 of Maharashtra Civil Services (Commutation of Pension) Rules, 1984 Bars Commutation of Provisional Pension When Proceedings Are Pending.

The petitioner, Parasram s/o Gomaji Nasre, a retired employee of Zilla Parishad, Chandrapur, filed a writ petition seeking commutation of his pension....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Deduction from Gratuity for Cooperative Loan Repayment. Employer Cannot Deduct Gratuity for Loan to Cooperative Society Unless It Is a Government Due Under Rule 132 read with Rule 134 of Maharashtra Civil Service (Pension) Rules, 1982.

The appellant, Ashfaq Husain, was a Section Officer with Zilla Parishad, Washim. Upon his retirement, the respondents (Chief Executive Officer, Block ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Denial of Promotion Benefits to Class III Employee. Petitioner appointed as Class IV employee and later promoted to Class III entitled to salary and benefits of higher post from date of promotion.

The petitioner, Satish Shahaji Fand, was initially appointed as a Class IV employee (Parichar) with the Zilla Parishad, Osmanabad. Subsequently, he wa...