Search Results for "Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act"

554 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 554 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court Affirms Need for Minority Establishment in AMU’s Minority Status Dispute" AMU’s Minority Status Under Scrutiny: Establishment by Legislature Versus Minority Founding Rights

The Supreme Court judgment in Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal & Ors. primarily deals with the issue of minority rights in education, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Blue Zone Classification Not Proved by State. Market Value Determined at Rs. 100 per sq. ft. Based on Comparable Awards for Similar Lands Acquired for Same Purpose Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case pertains to the acquisition of land owned by the appellant, Kazi Akiloddin, for the construction of a flood protection wall in Akola, Maharas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Premium and Interest Demands for Leasehold Land Conversion in Navi Mumbai. CIDCO's demand for premium and interest under Development Charges Rules and lease terms upheld as valid and not arbitrary.

The petitioners, Shelton Infrastructure Pvt Ltd, Neelkanth Infratech Co., and M/s. Juhi Habitat Pvt. Ltd., were lessees of plots in Navi Mumbai under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Development Right Certificate Issued to Developer. Court holds that issuance of DRC under MRTP Act was valid and no loss to public exchequer was caused.

The petitioner, Mr. Manoj Jaswantlal Kapadia, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court challenging the issuance of a Developmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Land Acquisition Notification for Pune Ring Road Project — Public Purpose and Compliance with Section 4 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Upheld. Petitioners Failed to Show Any Violation of Statutory Provisions or Fundamental Rights.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Shankar Dabhade and others, and Raghunath Sudam Dabhade and others, challenging a notification dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Unilateral Modification of Development Control Regulations by State. Held that DCRs are statutory and cannot be altered without following due process under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by D B Realty Limited and Salim Balwa (WP No.366 of 2014) and Savita Homemakers LLP and Akkshay Jain (W...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation Against Encroachment on CIDCO Land by Minister's Relative. Court Orders Demolition of Unauthorized Glass House Construction in No Development Zone and Coastal Regulation Zone.

The petitioner, Sandeep Sharadchandra Thakur, a resident of Navi Mumbai and Vice President of a multinational company, filed a Public Interest Litigat...