Search Results for "Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development & Regulation) Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development & Regulation) Act"

108 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 108 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging SIT Investigation into Market Committee Affairs. Government Order Appointing Special Investigating Team for Inquiry into Alleged Irregularities in Agricultural Produce Market Committee Upheld as Valid Exercise of Statutory Power.

10 Sep 2025

The petitioners, who were executive committee members of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Nagpur, challenged a Government order dated 18/07/...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging APMC Election Without Inclusion of Gram-Panchayat Members in Voters' List. Election process of APMC Tumsar set aside for non-compliance with Section 11(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development & Regulation) Act, 1963.

8 Feb 2024

The petitioner, Sadashiv Shivaji Dhenge, was elected as Sarpanch of Gram-Panchayat Hardoli in 2017, which falls within the territorial jurisdiction of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Nomination in APMC Election Due to Proposer's Disqualification. Nomination Rejection Set Aside as Proposer's Disqualification Under Section 45(2A) of Maharashtra APMC Act Not Applicable to Traders' Constituency.

21 Apr 2023

The petitioner, Navandar Nandlal Hiralal, filed a writ petition challenging the rejection of his nomination form for the election to the Agricultural ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Examines Interpretation of Provisos to Section 10A(2)(b) of MMDR Act in Writ Petitions. Prospecting Licence Holders Seek Mandamus for Execution of Mining Leases Pending Environmental Clearance.

27 May 2022

The High Court of Karnataka heard a group of four writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution by companies engaged in mining, seeking v...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Retrospective Demand of Market Fee and DPC Under Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act. Market Committee Cannot Levy Fee on Transactions Prior to Notification of Market Area Under Sections 26 and 27 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963.

29 Jul 2019

The petitioner, M/s. Arasa Hotels Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Co-option of Member in APMC for Violation of Section 14 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 — Failure to Provide Notice and Opportunity to Object Renders Co-option Invalid.

26 Jun 2019

The petitioners, Sadashiv Pandurang Patil and Audumbar Gorakh More, were members of the Karmala Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC). They cha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Minister's Order Setting Aside Supersession of Market Committee. Minister's order set aside for being unreasoned and without consideration of material on record under Section 45 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963.

9 Jan 2019

The petitioner, Dr. Dipraj P. Ilamkar, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 19.09.2018 passed by the Minister for Co-operation, Government...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Inclusion of Societies in Market Committee Election Process — Failure to Provide Notice and Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice. The court quashed the inclusion of respondent societies in the electoral roll of the Agriculture Produce Market Committee, Mantha, for want of notice and hearing, directing fresh exercise after compliance with natural justice.

28 Jul 2017

The petitioner, Kishanrao Sarjerao More, filed a writ petition challenging the inclusion of several cooperative societies in the electoral roll of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Postponement of APMC Elections Due to Non-Application of Mind. State Government's Order Under Section 14(3) and (3A) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 Set Aside for Lack of Proper Reasons.

9 Mar 2017

The petitioners, who are agriculturists and office-bearers of cooperative societies that are members of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APM...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Election Process of Agriculture Produce Market Committee — No Interference in Mid-Election Process Under Article 226. Inclusion of Names in Voters List Cannot Be Challenged After Election Process Has Commenced; Remedy Lies in Election Petition Under Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963.

22 Jan 2016

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by Chandrashekhar Shivram Mudkanna and Shamshoddin Ghudulal Jamadar against the State of Maharashtra...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)