Search Results for "MIDC Act"

621 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 621 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Magistrate's Order Directing Registration of FIR Under Section 175(3) BNSS Against MIDC Employee in Plot Allotment Case — Held That Magistrate Must Apply Judicial Mind and Not Pass Mechanical Orders Under Section 175(3) BNSS.

The petitioner, Namrata Subhash Pawar, an Assistant in MIDC, challenged the order dated 31.05.2025 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Dh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Industrial Court Orders in Labour Dispute — Upholds Interim Relief Granted to Union Under Section 30(2) of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. Industrial Court Has Jurisdiction to Grant Interim Relief Without First Deciding Maintainability of Complaint.

The case involves four writ petitions filed by industrial companies (M/s Saklecha Steel Industries Pvt. Ltd., M/s Sudesh Steel Industries Pvt. Ltd., M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Specific Performance Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's discretion to deny specific performance and award damages instead, finding no grounds for interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Rolta India Ltd., challenged an arbitral award dated 8th December, 2010 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging MIDC's Reservation of Open Space for Staff Housing. Petitioner's claim for allotment of reserved open space fails as no legal right established and policy decisions of MIDC upheld.

The petitioner, a society of industrial members in MIDC Jalgaon area, filed a writ petition challenging communications dated July 3, 2002 and July 8, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Husband and In-Laws for Murder by Burning in Dowry Death Case. Life Imprisonment Maintained Under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC Based on Dying Declaration and Circumstantial Evidence.

The case arises from a criminal appeal filed by four accused persons (husband, father-in-law, brother-in-law, and mother-in-law of the deceased) again...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Under MIDC Act — Notice and Notification Upheld as Valid. Petitioners failed to demonstrate any illegality in acquisition proceedings under the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation Act, 1961.

The petitioners, Baban Haribhau Yadav, Mansingh Haribhau Yadav, and Pratap Haribhau Yadav, owned and possessed agricultural land bearing plot No.425, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Water Cess Levy on Industrial Groundwater Use. Levy under Section 12 of Maharashtra Irrigation Act, 1976 is compensatory and regulatory, not a tax, and validly imposed on industries drawing groundwater for commercial purposes.

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by industrial companies—BILT Graphic Paper Products Ltd., UltraTech CemCo Ltd., and Associated Ceme...