Search Results for "MHADA Act"

238 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 238 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Condemns 36-Year Delay in Compensation Payment for Land Acquisition. Bombay High Court reprimands MHADA and State Government for failing to compensate a property owner for over three decades, declaring the delay a violation of constitutional rights.

The Bombay High Court,  addressed a severe delay in compensating the petitioner for the acquisition of his property. The petitioner’s land was acqu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Release of Land from ULC Proceedings Due to Abatement Under Repeal Act — Land Held to Be Bhoomiswami, Not Nazul Lease, Entitling Petitioners to Restoration of Possession and Mutation.

The petitioners, Smt. Parvatibai wd/o Dashrath Behar and Narayan s/o Late Shri Dashrath Behar, filed a writ petition seeking release of land admeasuri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Additional FSI Grant Under DCR Regulation 33(1) — Petitioner's Lack of Locus Standi and Failure to Establish Public Wrong Leads to Dismissal of Petition Seeking to Protect Mill Workers' Housing Rights.

The petitioner, Nitesh Mohanlal Doshi, claiming to be a social activist and environmentalist, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Bombay H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MHADA's 10-Year Transfer Ban on Rehab Tenements as Unconstitutional and Ultra Vires. Condition in NOC restricting sale/transfer of tenancy rights for ten years from occupation held to be without statutory authority and violative of Article 300A of the Constitution.

The Bombay High Court dealt with two writ petitions challenging a condition imposed by the Mumbai Building Repairs & Reconstruction Board (a unit of M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging MHADA's Surplus Area Demand in Redevelopment — Condition 22 of NOC Valid Under MHAD Act. Petitioners' Challenge to Communication Dated 6 July 2007 and Appellate Order Rejected.

The petitioners, owners of a property admeasuring about 546 sq. mtrs. in Mumbai, sought redevelopment and obtained a No Objection Certificate (NOC) fr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Cooperative Housing Society's Petition Quashing MHADA Circular Imposing Additional Premium on Redevelopment. Circular dated 17-10-2007 held ultra vires and not applicable retrospectively to societies which had already obtained NOC, IOD, and Commencement Certificate.

The petitioner, Vishva-Villa Cooperative Housing Society Limited, a society registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, owned a plot o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Challenge to Cancellation of NOC for Redevelopment Due to Misrepresentation of Tenant Status. Landlord's Failure to Disclose Correct Residential Status of Tenants Renders Permission Void Ab Initio Under DCR 33(7) and MHADA Act.

The petitioners, Dahyabhai Papers & Boards Pvt. Ltd. and another, owned a dilapidated cessed building in Mumbai. They applied for redevelopment under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Builder's Appeals Against Interim Injunction in Specific Performance Suits — Agreements to Sell Not Concluded as Essential Terms Remained Unsettled. The court held that without a concluded contract, no prima facie case exists for interim injunction under Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appellant, M/s Rupji Constructions, a partnership firm engaged in construction business, entered into several agreements to sell with various flat...