Search Results for "Livelihood"

139 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 139 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Legal Profession and Consumer Protection Laws: Navigating the Boundaries Exploring the Applicability of Consumer Protection Laws to Advocates and Legal Services

The case concerns the applicability of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (CP Act), as re-enacted in 2019, to complaints alleging "deficiency in servic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Land Acquisition Dispute: Supreme Court Stresses Prompt Compensation Ensuring Justice for Property Owners in Disputed Acquisitions

Land acquisition, compensation, fundamental rights, right to property, due process of law, eminent domain, delay and laches, judicial discretion, fres...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Complainant not required to prove service obtained for self-employment livelihood unless appellant proves commercial purpose.

Consumer Protection - Maintainability of Complaint - Definition of Consumer - Service obtained for Commercial Purpose - Onus of Proof - Burden of Proo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Petition filed challenging rejection of maternity leave benefits under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution. Upholding women's rights and dignity in the workplace: A landmark judgment on maternity leave entitlements.

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution challenging the rejection of maternity leave benefits for Petitioner No. 2 by Respondent N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Appeals under Section 173 of Motor Vehicle Act in Fatal Accident Case. Disputing Liability and Compensation.

Appeals filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act against a judgment and award issued by the Motor Accident Claim Tribu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator's Award in Contract Dispute Over Final Bill Claims. Court Held That Arbitrator's Consideration of Vitiating Factors and Contract Clauses Was Permissible Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Despite Prohibition on Further Claims in Clauses 65 and 65A.

The dispute arose from a contract dated 02.07.2001 for repair works, with time extended to 19.01.2002. The respondent contractor submitted a final bil...