Search Results for "Isolated post"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Isolated post"

353 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 353 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Notice for Chennai Metro Station. Petitioner's challenge centered on whether CMRL's show cause notice under Section 3(2) of Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997 was vitiated by post-decisional hearing after CMRL undertook before court in an earlier PIL to acquire the land.

11 Mar 2025

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by United India Insurance Company Limited, challenging a show cause notice ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Appeals Filed Against Single Judge Order in Land Acquisition Matters Involving KIADB. Appeals Challenge Order Dated 04.07.2025 in Various Writ Petitions Filed by Landowners and Developers.

29 Jul 2026

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Death Reference and Appeals Arising from 2000 Church Bomb Blast Case. Accused Allegedly part of Deendar Anjuman, charged with conspiracy under IPC Sections 120-B, 121-A, 124-A, 153-A.

17 Dec 2014

On December 17, 2014, the High Court of Karnataka delivered a common judgment in Criminal RC No. 3/2008, Criminal Appeal No. 1203/2008, and Criminal A...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Kalaburagi Bench Considers Criminal Appeal Against Conviction Under Sections 498A and 302 IPC. The Court Framed Issues on Trial Validity Due to Accused’s Mental Condition and Adequacy of Prosecution Evidence Including Hostile Witnesses.

21 Dec 2020

The criminal appeal arose from the judgment and order of the II Additional District and Sessions Judge at Raichur in S.C. No.1/2015 convicting the acc...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Interprets Section 175(4) BNSS in Sexual Assault Case Against Police Officers -- Clarifies Public Servant Immunity and Investigation Procedures Under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita

27 Jan 2026

The Supreme Court addressed a criminal appeal involving interpretation of Section 175(4) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) -- The app...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind to Witness Statements. The court held that the detaining authority failed to properly consider in-camera statements, violating the detenu's right to make an effective representation under Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

14 Mar 2013

The petitioner, Ravi Hanumant Thorat, brother-in-law of the detenu Sahadeo @ Sada Laxman Dhavare, challenged the validity of a preventive detention or...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Senior Teacher in Minority Institution Challenging Appointment of Head Master. Management's Right to Appoint Head of School by Nomination Under Section 3(2) of MEPS Act, 1977 Upheld.

1 May 2006

The petitioner, Hussain Khan, was a senior lecturer at Shah Babu Urdu Jr. College, Patur, which is a minority institution under Article 30 of the Cons...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Scrutiny Committee Order Invalidating ST Claim of Councilor in Mana Caste Case — Emphasizes Need for Holistic Appreciation of Documentary Evidence Over Isolated Entries. The Court remanded the matter for fresh consideration in light of Division Bench precedent, holding that benefit of doubt should be given to the claimant when majority of documents support the claim.

17 Sep 2018

The petitioner, Yashoda Pralhad Wakade, was elected as a Ward Member (Councilor) from Ward No.6 of Municipal Council, Hingna on 01.11.2015, from a sea...

Supreme Court

GULFISHA FATIMA

1 Jan 1970

The present appeals before the Supreme Court arise from a common judgment of the High Court of Delhi which affirmed the rejection of bail applications...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — No Deceptive Similarity Between STIMULIV and STIMULET for Different Pharmaceutical Products. The court held that the mark 'STIMULET' used for an allopathic breast cancer drug does not infringe the registered mark 'STIMULIV' used for Ayurvedic liver medicines due to differences in nature, trade channels, and customers under Section 29(2) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

20 Jan 2023

The case involves a trademark infringement and passing off dispute between two pharmaceutical companies. The appellant, Corona Remedies Private Limite...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)