Search Results for "Industrial Court jurisdiction"

4800 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4800 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Workman's Petition Challenging Interlocutory Order in Domestic Enquiry — Holds That Item 1 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act Cannot Be Invoked Against Every Interlocutory Order Passed by Enquiry Officer

The petitioner, Vinod Pattar, a workman employed by M/s. EIH Ltd. (the Oberoi Hotel), challenged an interlocutory order dated 21/12/2021 passed by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Forest Department Challenging Industrial Court Order Granting Permanency to Daily Wage Workers. The Industrial Court's order directing grant of permanency to workers engaged for years as daily wagers was upheld as no error of jurisdiction or perversity was found.

The Deputy Conservator of Forest, Nashik Van Vibhag (E), Nasik and others (petitioners) filed a Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Industrial Dispute Reference Due to Procedural Irregularity in Conciliation Initiation Under Industrial Disputes Act

The Supreme Court allowed the civil appeal filed by Appellants challenging the reference of industrial dispute to Industrial Court, Aurangabad -- The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order Quashing Labour Court Judgment Without Specific Remand. Industrial Court Cannot Remand Matters as a Matter of Routine Course Under MRTU & PULP Act.

The petitioner, Machindra Chandrabhan Dange, a labourer, filed a complaint before the Labour Court, Ahmednagar, alleging unfair labour practices. The ...