Search Results for "Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department"

92 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 92 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Hears Writ Appeal in HR & CE Promotion Case — Considers Governing Principles on Promotion. Promotion Is Not a Right but Consideration Is Fundamental, and Filling Up Posts Is Administrative Prerogative; Panel Inclusion Gives No Right.

6 Jul 2026

Background: The writ appeal arose from an order dated 24.01.2025 passed by a single judge in W.P.No.14422 of 2016, which was filed by the respondent, ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Trial Court Order on Memo for Additional Issues in Suit for Partition and Injunction. Court Holds That Trial Court Erred in Rejecting Memo Without Considering Its Merits and That the Memo Was Not Barred by Res Judicata or Constructive Res Judicata.

2 Jul 2026

The petitioners, who are the plaintiffs in O.S. No.30/2007 pending before the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC, Gowribidanur, filed a suit for partition...

High Court

Madras High Court Directs Eviction of Encroachers from Temple Property Under HR&CE Act — Writ Petition Disposed with Directions to Initiate Proceedings Under Section 78 Within Twelve Weeks. The court held that HR&CE authorities must protect temple properties and initiate eviction proceedings under Section 78 of the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959, for encroachments identified at Kanjanaikkan Patty Village, Survey No.169/1.

27 Apr 2026

The writ petition was filed by M. Dhanam under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 4 (D...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition for Non-Compliance of Temple Land Restoration Order — Finds No Wilful Disobedience Due to Ongoing Administrative Process and Legal Hurdles. The court held that mere delay or difficulty in compliance does not amount to contempt unless there is wilful and deliberate disobedience.

27 Feb 2026

The contempt petition was filed by A.Radhakrishnan, party-in-person, alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated 23.10.2019 in WP(MD)No.64 of 2018...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Appeal by College Secretary Against Regularisation of Assistant Professor. Appointment of Teacher Without Following UGC Regulations and University Norms Held Invalid, No Right to Regularisation.

12 Jan 2026

The case pertains to a writ appeal filed by the Secretary of Arulmigu Palaniandavar College of Arts and Culture against an order of a learned Single J...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Order Under HR&CE Act Due to Availability of Alternative Remedy. Statutory Appeal Under Section 69 of Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 Renders Writ Petition Not Maintainable.

3 Jan 2025

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by a registered society representing Thriswathanthirargal (Sthalathars) cla...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by Captive Power Producers in Hydel Policy Dispute Over Water Royalty Charges. The court held that the agreements incorporating the government policy did not impose water royalty liability on captive power producers, distinguishing them from independent power producers under the policy framework.

6 Sep 2021

The dispute arose from appeals filed by M/s. Indsil Hydro Power and Manganese Limited (INDSIL) and Carborundum Universal Limited (CUMI) against a comm...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Land Grabbing Special Court Order in Land Dispute Case — Petitioner's Claim Dismissed for Lack of Evidence. The court held that the Special Court's finding of land grabbing by the petitioner was based on proper appreciation of evidence and did not warrant interference under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution.

26 Nov 2019

The petitioner, Smt. Sunitha, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment dated 15.04.2019 ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Transfer Order in Land Grabbing Case — Civil Court Retains Jurisdiction Over Suit for Declaration and Injunction. Section 20 of Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 Does Not Mandate Transfer of Civil Suit Where No Allegation of Land Grabbing is Made in Plaint.

14 Mar 2019

The petitioner, Joseph Saldhana, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 30.10.2018 passed by...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Transfer Order in Land Grabbing Case — Civil Court Retains Jurisdiction Over Title Suit. Section 20 of Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 Does Not Mandate Transfer of Suit Where No Land Grabbing Allegation is Made by Government.

14 Mar 2019

The petitioner, Joseph Saldhana, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 30.10.2018 passed by the 1st Additional Civil Judge, Mangaluru, in ...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)