Madras High Court Directs Eviction of Encroachers from Temple Property Under HR&CE Act — Writ Petition Disposed with Directions to Initiate Proceedings Under Section 78 Within Twelve Weeks. The court held that HR&CE authorities must protect temple properties and initiate eviction proceedings under Section 78 of the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959, for encroachments identified at Kanjanaikkan Patty Village, Survey No.169/1.

High Court: Madras High Court
  • 72
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The writ petition was filed by M. Dhanam under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 4 (District Collector, Tahsildar, Commissioner of Kadayampatty Union, and Joint Commissioner of HR&CE Department) to consider her claim to remove encroachment made at Kanjanaikkan Patty Village, Survey No.169/1, Panchayat Road, Kadayampatty Taluk, Salem District. The learned Additional Government Pleader for the HR&CE Department submitted that authorities conducted an inspection and found temple properties encroached upon, and that a civil suit had been instituted by the petitioner. The court observed that the competent authorities under the HR&CE Act must initiate appropriate enforcement action to protect temple properties. If encroachments are identified, eviction proceedings under Section 78 of the HR&CE Act are to be initiated. The petitioner and respondents are at liberty to defend their case. Consequently, the court directed respondents 2, 3, and 4 to initiate appropriate action to evict encroachers from temple properties by following procedures under the HR&CE Act within twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. The writ petition was disposed of with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Temple Property - Encroachment - Eviction - Section 78 of the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 - The writ petition sought a direction to remove encroachment on temple property. The court held that the HR&CE authorities must initiate enforcement action to protect temple properties and, if encroachments are identified, eviction proceedings under Section 78 of the HR&CE Act must be initiated. The respondents 2, 3, and 4 were directed to evict encroachers within twelve weeks following procedures under the Act. (Paras 2-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the respondents 1 to 4 should be directed to consider the petitioner's claim to remove encroachment on temple property at Kanjanaikkan Patty Village, Survey No.169/1, Panchayat Road, Kadayampatty Taluk, Salem District.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition was disposed of with directions to respondents 2, 3, and 4 to initiate appropriate action to evict encroachers from temple properties by following procedures under the HR&CE Act within twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Encroachment on temple property
  • Eviction under Section 78 of HR&CE Act
  • Duty of HR&CE authorities to protect temple properties
  • Mandamus for removal of encroachment
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (04) 89

W.P.No.49049 of 2025

2026-04-27

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, K.SURENDER

Mr.P.Rajendiran, Mr.T.Arunkumar, Dr.S.Suriya, Mr.S.Ravichandran, Mr.T.Ganesan

M.Dhanam

The District Collector, The Tahsildar, The Commissioner, The Joint Commissioner of Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, N.Rajasekar, J.Manikandan

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus to direct respondents to remove encroachment on temple property.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought a direction to respondents 1 to 4 to consider her claim to remove encroachment at Kanjanaikkan Patty Village, Survey No.169/1, Panchayat Road, Kadayampatty Taluk, Salem District.

Filing Reason

Alleged encroachment on temple property at the specified location.

Previous Decisions

A civil suit had been instituted by the petitioner.

Issues

Whether the respondents should be directed to consider the petitioner's claim to remove encroachment on temple property.

Submissions/Arguments

The learned Additional Government Pleader for HR&CE Department submitted that authorities conducted an inspection and found temple properties encroached upon, and that a civil suit had been instituted by the petitioner.

Ratio Decidendi

The competent authorities under the HR&CE Act must initiate enforcement action to protect temple properties. If encroachments are identified, eviction proceedings under Section 78 of the HR&CE Act are to be initiated.

Judgment Excerpts

The learned Additional Government Pleader, appearing on behalf of the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, would submit that the authorities conducted an inspection and found that the temple properties are encroached upon. Under these circumstances, the competent authorities under the HR&CE Act have to initiate appropriate enforcement action to ensure that the temple properties are protected. If any encroachments are identified, eviction proceedings under Section 78 of HR&CE Act are to be initiated. the respondents 2, 3 and 4 are directed to initiate appropriate action to evict the encroachers from the temple properties by following procedures contemplated under the HR&CE Act, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The court heard the learned Additional Government Pleader for the HR&CE Department and disposed of the petition with directions.

Acts & Sections

  • Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959: 78
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Directs Eviction of Encroachers from Temple Property Under HR&CE Act — Writ Petition Disposed with Directions to Initiate Proceedings Under Section 78 Within Twelve Weeks. The court held that HR&CE authorities must protect temple ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Rejection of Additional Evidence in NI Act Case — Settlement Agreement After Trial Held Relevant. The appellate court must consider subsequent events that affect the merits of the case under Section 391 CrP...