Search Results for "Foreign Direct Investment"

319 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 319 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to SAFEMA Forfeiture Order — Agricultural Land Acquired Prior to Detention Exempt from Forfeiture. Property acquired before the 'illegal' period under Section 2(2)(b) of SAFEMA cannot be forfeited; appellate authority's order partly confirmed.

The petitioner, Ranchhodbhai Bhagwanbhai Tandel (since deceased, through his legal heir Naresh Ranchhodbhai Tandel), filed a criminal writ petition un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Decides on the Validity of Arbitral Award Covering Foreign Immoveable Properties Excluded from Preliminary Decree in a Partition Suit. Construction of Reference to Arbitration under Section 21 of the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 Clarified.

The dispute arose from a partition suit filed by the respondent, Subramaniam Chettiar, against his brother, Nachiappa Chettiar, and his sons (appellan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition by Debenture Trustee Seeking Deposit and Injunction — No Prima Facie Case for Interim Relief as Trustee Failed to Establish Breach of Trust or Impairment of Security Under Trust Deed and Information Memorandum.

The petitioner, IDBI Trusteeship Services Limited, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking interim rel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Presidential Reference Made to Supreme Court Seeks Advisory Opinion on Telecom Licences and Spectrum Allocation Policies. Reference Under Article 143(1) Recites Historical Grant of Licences from 1994 to 2008 Including First-Come-First-Served and Revenue Share Regimes.

Background: The President of India made a reference under Article 143(1) of the Constitution on 12.04.2012, seeking the advisory opinion of the Suprem...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Interim Order Restraining Non-Compete Beyond Contract Term. Arbitrator erred in treating Joint Venture Company as partnership and enforcing non-compete clause beyond its stipulated duration under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Commercial Arbitration Petition No.25 of 2021 was filed by Elster Instromet B.V. (Instromet) challenging an order dated 09/10/2020 passed by the A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 499 OF 2012

The appeal before the High Court arose out of an order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dismissing the assessee's appeal and upholdi...