Search Results for "FIR not encyclopedia"

97 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 97 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in SC/ST Act Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Public Witness. Caste-Based Insult Allegation Fails as Incident Occurred in Private Setting, Not in Public View Under Section 3(1)(xi) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The appellant, Namdeo Dnyanaba Agarkar, was convicted by the Special Judge under the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Chandrakant Keshav Mohite and Suryakant Keshav Mohite, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Satara in Sessions Case No. 38...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Brother for Causing Grievous Hurt to Crippled Sister Under Section 325 IPC. Medical Evidence of Fractured Clavicle and Ribs Corroborates Eyewitness Testimony, Conviction Maintained.

The appellant, Murlidhar Namdeo Thite, was prosecuted in Sessions Case No.127/1996 before the 2nd Adhoc Additional District & Sessions Judge, Shriramp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Discharges Accused Brothers in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations. General and omnibus allegations against relatives living separately are insufficient to frame charges under Sections 304-B, 306, 498-A IPC.

The judgment concerns two criminal applications filed by accused No.4 (Chetan Chowdhary) and accused No.6 (Anup Chowdhary) seeking discharge in Sessio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Unreliable Testimony. Conviction under Section 376(2)(i) IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Mangesh Chandankhede, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-1, Nagpur, for offences under Section 376(2)(i) of the Indian Pena...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Confirms Death Sentence for Accused No.1 and Life Imprisonment for Accused No.2 in Murder and Robbery Case. The court upheld the conviction under Sections 302 and 392 IPC based on circumstantial evidence including last seen theory and recovery of stolen articles.

The case involves the murder of Vijayatai Vitthalrao Pund, a 75-year-old woman, who was the mother of PW1 Sunil, a practicing lawyer. The incident occ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Material Contradictions and Improbable Prosecution Case. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Testimony of Prosecutrix Lacks Credibility and Medical Evidence Does Not Support Forcible Intercourse.

The appellant, Hiraman Jangu Uike, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, for offences under Sections 376 and 448 of the Indian Penal Code, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Anticipatory Bail to Accused in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Caste-Based Intent. Traffic Dispute Leading to Abusive Language Does Not Attract Section 3(1)(x) of SC/ST Act as Insult Was Not on Account of Caste.

The appellant, Dada @ Anil s/o Navnath Murkute, filed a criminal appeal under Section 14-A of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Preventio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 452 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness failed to identify accused and medical evidence did not support prosecution version.

The appellant, Kailas Sopan Jade, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amalner, for offences under Sections 302, 307 and 452 of the Indian ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Rape of Minor Based on Testimony of Victim and Medical Evidence. The court held that the sole testimony of the victim, if credible, is sufficient for conviction under Section 376 IPC, and medical evidence corroborated the rape.

The appellant, Vincent Fernandes, was convicted under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for raping a 14-year-old girl on 31 March 1999 at Van...