Bombay High Court Confirms Death Sentence for Accused No.1 and Life Imprisonment for Accused No.2 in Murder and Robbery Case. The court upheld the conviction under Sections 302 and 392 IPC based on circumstantial evidence including last seen theory and recovery of stolen articles.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Prosecution
  • 64
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves the murder of Vijayatai Vitthalrao Pund, a 75-year-old woman, who was the mother of PW1 Sunil, a practicing lawyer. The incident occurred in Venus Park, Kanta Nagar, Amravati. The prosecution case was that accused no.1 Ajay Dayaram Gopnarayan and accused no.2 Nitin Nandkishor Gudadhe, who had worked as labourers during the construction of the house and later resided there, committed the murder and robbery. Accused no.1 had stayed in the house for about 1¼ months, 10 months prior to the incident, and was familiar with the premises. The deceased was found dead with injuries, and valuable items were missing. The trial court convicted both accused under Sections 302 and 392 IPC, sentencing accused no.1 to death and accused no.2 to life imprisonment. The High Court, in a confirmation case and appeal, examined the circumstantial evidence, including the last seen theory, motive, and recovery of stolen articles. The court found that the chain of circumstances was complete and pointed to the guilt of the accused. The death sentence of accused no.1 was confirmed, and the life imprisonment of accused no.2 was upheld.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder and Robbery - Sections 302, 392 IPC - Circumstantial Evidence - The case was based on circumstantial evidence including last seen theory, motive, and recovery of stolen articles - The court held that the chain of circumstances was complete and pointed to the guilt of the accused - The death sentence of accused no.1 was confirmed and the life imprisonment of accused no.2 was upheld (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction and sentence of accused no.1 for murder and robbery under Sections 302 and 392 IPC, including the death sentence, and the conviction and life imprisonment of accused no.2 for the same offences, are sustainable based on circumstantial evidence.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court confirmed the death sentence of accused no.1 Ajay Dayaram Gopnarayan and dismissed the appeal of both accused, upholding the conviction and sentence.

Law Points

  • Murder
  • Robbery
  • Death Sentence
  • Life Imprisonment
  • Circumstantial Evidence
  • Last Seen Theory
  • Motive
  • Recovery of Stolen Articles
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (BOM) (01) 137

Criminal Confirmation Case No. 1/2013 and Criminal Appeal No. 225/2013

2014-01-17

A. B. Chaudhari, Z. A. Haq

Mr. R. G. Mundhada for appellants; Mr. S. S. Doifode and Mr. M. A. Kadu, A.P.P. for respondent

State of Maharashtra (in Confirmation Case); Ajay Dayaram Gopnarayan and Nitin Nandkishor Gudadhe (in Criminal Appeal)

Ajay Dayaram Gopnarayan and Nitin Nandkishor Gudadhe (in Confirmation Case); State of Maharashtra (in Criminal Appeal)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal confirmation case for death sentence and criminal appeal against conviction and sentence

Remedy Sought

Confirmation of death sentence by State; acquittal by accused

Filing Reason

Conviction for murder and robbery under Sections 302 and 392 IPC

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted accused no.1 to death and accused no.2 to life imprisonment

Issues

Whether the conviction based on circumstantial evidence is sustainable Whether the death sentence is appropriate

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that the evidence was insufficient and circumstantial State argued that the chain of circumstances was complete

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the circumstantial evidence, including last seen theory, motive, and recovery of stolen articles, formed a complete chain pointing to the guilt of the accused, warranting confirmation of death sentence and life imprisonment.

Judgment Excerpts

This is a Criminal Reference Registration No.1/2013 for confirmation of death sentence against accused no.1 Ajay Dayaram Gopnarayan. Both the accused persons ... have also preferred Criminal Appeal No.225/2013 praying for acquittal against judgment of conviction for offences punishable under section 302 and 392 of I.P.C.

Procedural History

The trial court convicted the accused; the State filed a confirmation case for death sentence, and the accused filed an appeal against conviction. Both were heard together.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 302, 392
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Tenant's Appeal in Rent Control Case for Abuse of Process and Overreaching Court Orders. Eviction order under Section 21(2) of U.P. Urban Premises Rent Control Ordinance, 2021 was final and binding, and restoration application...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Estate Administration Suit — Appellant Failed to Establish Entitlement to Relief Under Consent Decree of 1958. The court held that the notice of motion seeking compliance with consent terms was not maintainable...