Search Results for "Export deduction"

87 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 87 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Enforcement of Consent Terms Against Non-Signatory Defendant in Debenture Dispute. Interpretation of Consent Decree Held That Clause 11(a) Obligation to Pay Was Only on Defendant No.5, Not Defendant No.6, Who Was Not a Party to the Consent Terms.

The case involves two appeals filed by the original Defendant No.5 (Dewanchand Ramsaran Trading Pvt. Ltd. and others) against a common order of the le...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Upholds Disallowance of Capital Losses and Business Loss on Guarantee Transactions. Tribunal's findings on sham transactions and lack of commercial substance affirmed under Income Tax Act, 1961.

The appellant, Killick Nixon Limited, filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeals in Karnataka VAT Act Cases on Input Tax Credit Claims. Court Interprets Section 70 to Hold Purchasing Dealers Discharged Burden of Proof Through Genuine Invoices and Payments, Entitling Them to ITC Despite Seller Defaults.

The dispute involved appeals by the State of Karnataka (revenue) against High Court judgments that dismissed revision applications and allowed Input T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Recovery Suit — Holds That High Court Erred in Dismissing Suit on Grounds Not Raised in Pleadings and Without Considering Documentary Evidence. The Court restored the decree for recovery of Rs.96,41,765.31 with interest at 15% per annum from the date of suit till payment.

The appellant, M/s Star Paper Mills Limited, filed a suit for recovery of Rs.96,41,765.31 against the respondents, M/s Beharilal Madanlal Jaipuria Ltd...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeal in Customs Duty Priority Dispute. Customs duty under Section 150(2)(c) of Customs Act, 1962 has priority over warehouse charges under Section 150(2)(d) in distribution of sale proceeds of warehoused goods.

The case involves a dispute between the Union of India (appellant) and M/s. Associated Container Terminal Ltd. (respondent) regarding the priority of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Supplier Against Western Coalfields Limited for Withholding Admitted Dues. Withholding of Payment Based on Vigilance Report Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Sujyoti India (P) Limited, a private limited company and authorized distributor of SKF India Limited, entered into a rate contract wit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income-tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material. Reassessment Based on Change of Opinion on Commission Payment to Directors Held Invalid as All Issues Were Examined During Original Assessment.

The Petitioner, M/s. Dalal & Broacha Stock Broking Pvt. Ltd., a stock broking company, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2008-09 declarin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by States of Karnataka and Kerala in Lottery Tax Dispute — State Legislatures Have Competence to Tax Lotteries Under Entry 62 List II. Regulatory Entry 40 List I Does Not Bar State Taxation of Lotteries Organised by Other States.

The Supreme Court considered appeals by the States of Karnataka and Kerala against judgments of their respective High Courts which had struck down sta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State's Power to Fix Higher Sugarcane Price in Conflict Resolution Between Constitution Benches. State Advised Price (SAP) is Valid and Not Repugnant to Central Minimum Price Under Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966.

The Supreme Court considered a reference from a three-judge bench regarding an alleged conflict between two Constitution Bench decisions: Ch. Tika Ram...