Search Results for "Electricity Connection"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Electricity Connection"

730 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 730 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes Appellate Order in Electricity Theft Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Tampering. Disconnection of Electricity Supply Without Proof of Theft or Tampering Under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003 Held Illegal.

3 Mar 2026

The present petition was filed by Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Ltd and another (the petitioners) under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challe...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petitioner in Property Dispute and Electricity Disconnection Case Due to Time-Barred Municipal Action and Violation of Court Order. BBMP's Cancellation of Khata After 20 Years Held Time-Barred Under Section 114A of Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976, and BESCOM's Disconnection Notice Quashed for Disregarding Interim Status Quo Order.

26 Feb 2026

The dispute involved two consolidated writ petitions concerning property rights and administrative actions. The petitioner had acquired Flat No. 3 in ...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Power Theft Recovery Suit — Failure to Prove Ownership and Possession of Premises Renders Decree Unsustainable. The court held that the plaintiff must establish the defendant's ownership or possession of the premises where theft occurred to fix liability under the Indian Electricity Act, 1910.

16 Jan 2026

The appellant, Gajendrasinh P Zala, filed a First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and decree da...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Electricity Theft Case Against Owner — Mere Ownership Not Sufficient for Section 135 Liability. The court held that without specific evidence of direct involvement in tampering, the owner cannot be prosecuted under the Electricity Act, 2003.

9 Oct 2025

The applicant, Navin Prakashsingh Thakur, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of F...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows BSNL's Petition Against MSEDCL for Wrongful Tariff Categorization Under Electricity Act, 2003. Telecom Service Provider Cannot Be Classified as 'Commercial' for Electricity Tariff Purposes; MERC Must Determine Correct Category.

16 Apr 2024

The Petitioner, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. (BSNL), a telecom service provider and a central public sector enterprise, filed a writ petition under Artic...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses BBMP's Challenge to KERC Order on Electricity Tariff — Regulatory Commission's Order Upheld as Reasonable and Within Powers. The court held that the KERC had followed due process and the order was not liable to be quashed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.

5 Sep 2017

The petitioner, Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike (BBMP), filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Damages Suit for Wrongful Demolition — Plaintiff Failed to Prove Title and Possession. Suit for damages dismissed as plaintiff did not establish ownership or lawful possession of the demolished structure under the Specific Relief Act, 1963 and the Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

2 Dec 2016

The case involves two appeals arising from a common judgment of the Additional District Judge, North Goa, Panaji, in a suit for damages filed by the p...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Electricity Bills Based on Unverified Meter Readings. Dispute pertains to demand for arrears under Section 56 of the Electricity Act, 2003, where the licensee failed to provide inspection report or verify meter readings.

2 Feb 2016

The petitioner, M/s Channagiri Cements Pvt. Ltd., a cement manufacturing company, filed two writ petitions challenging the demand for arrears of elect...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Electricity Dues Recovery Suit — Limitation Period for Suit by Electricity Board Governed by Article 113 of Limitation Act, 1963, Not Article 14. Suit for recovery of arrears of electricity charges filed within three years of demand notice held within limitation; interest rate reduced from 18% to 12% p.a.

23 Sep 2010

The appeal was filed by M/s. G.T. Iron & Steel Works (original defendants) against the judgment and decree dated 15th June 2002 passed by the Civil Ju...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds BEST's Right to Recover Electricity Dues for Under-Recording Due to Loose Connections — Consumer Liable for Unrecorded Consumption Despite Absence of Malice. The court held that a consumer must pay for electricity actually consumed even if the meter under-recorded due to a technical defect, as the consumer had the benefit of the supply and the defect was not disputed.

4 Feb 2005

The case involves a dispute between the Municipal Corporation for Greater Bombay (BEST Undertaking) and Sharda Dyeing & Printing Works, a consumer of ...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)