Search Results for "Decree satisfaction"

1237 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1237 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Conditional Order Setting Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Eviction Suit. Court upholds condition of depositing arrears of rent as a valid exercise of discretion under Order IX Rule 13 of CPC.

The petitioners, Hargovindas Shivlal & Co. and others, were lessees of an open plot of land in Chembur, Mumbai. They had entered into a leave and lice...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Decree-Holders' Appeals Against Executing Court's Interim Stay Order in Execution Proceedings. Held That Executing Court Cannot Stay Execution Beyond Order XXI Rule 29 CPC and Must Follow Procedure Under Order XXI Rule 37 CPC Before Arrest.

The case involves appeals by the decree-holders (appellants) against an interim order dated 29th June 2018 passed by the Principal Sub-Judge, Kottayam...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Execution Proceedings for Specific Performance — Decree Holder Entitled to Enforce Compromise Award Despite Judgment Debtor's SC Status. Executing Court Cannot Go Behind Decree to Question Its Validity Under Karnataka SC/ST (PTCL) Act, 1978.

The petitioner, Shri Rahees Ahmed, was the decree holder in a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 10.01.2011 in respect of lan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Appeal Against Order in Execution Proceedings; Permits Power of Attorney Holder to Argue. Execution of Decree for Possession in Specific Performance Suit Involves Third Party Rights.

This appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent read with Order XXI Rule 103 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenged the order of a learned...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision in Specific Performance Suit — Res Judicata Not Applicable to Lok Adalat Award. Court holds that a compromise decree passed by Lok Adalat does not bar a subsequent suit for specific performance of the same agreement.

The revision application was filed by the petitioner (Ajitpalsingh Khalsa) against the order dated 21/11/2015 passed by the Jt. Civil Judge (SD) Amrav...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Madras Quashes Ex-Parte Compromise Decree? – Revision Petitions Challenge Validity Under Order XXIII CPC. Alleged settlement decree in property suits passed without hearing all parties violated procedural safeguards of Order XXIII of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The two Civil Revision Petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution of India were filed against the common judgment and decree dated 11.12.2024 in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Husband's Appeal in Divorce Case Due to Procedural Irregularities. Family Court Decree Set Aside for Failure to Frame Issues and Denial of Opportunity to Lead Evidence.

The appellant-husband challenged the judgment and decree dated 24th April 2015 passed by the Family Court at Bandra, Mumbai in Petition No. A-869 of 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition to Quash Compromise Decree in Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction — Held That Compromise Decree Was Not Validly Passed as It Was Based on a Consent Term That Was Contrary to Law and Without Jurisdiction.

The case involves a dispute over property ownership. The original petitioner, Narhar Rango Kulkarni (since deceased, represented by legal heirs), file...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Set Aside Ex Parte Decree in Money Suit — Service of Summons Valid Under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC. The court held that the defendant had knowledge of the suit and failed to show sufficient cause for non-appearance, upholding the ex parte decree.

The appellant, M/s. CliniRX Research Pvt. Ltd., was the original defendant in a money suit filed by the respondent, Bicare Limited, for recovery of mo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Extends Time for Payment Under Section 148 CPC Despite Plaintiff's Objection in Consent Decree Default Case. Court holds that Section 148 CPC empowers the court to extend time for payment in a consent decree for reasonable cause, even without the consent of the decree-holder.

The case arises from a Notice of Motion filed by the Defendants (Applicants) to set aside an ex parte decree dated 19 December 2012 in Summary Suit No...