Bombay High Court Extends Time for Payment Under Section 148 CPC Despite Plaintiff's Objection in Consent Decree Default Case. Court holds that Section 148 CPC empowers the court to extend time for payment in a consent decree for reasonable cause, even without the consent of the decree-holder.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 43
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case arises from a Notice of Motion filed by the Defendants (Applicants) to set aside an ex parte decree dated 19 December 2012 in Summary Suit No.906 of 2011. The decree ordered the Defendants to pay Rs.1,04,50,000 with interest at 18% per annum. During the hearing of the Motion, the parties settled and filed consent terms on 19 November 2015, which were taken on record and the Motion was disposed of. The consent terms provided for payment of Rs.90 lakhs in two installments of Rs.45 lakhs each, the first payable on or before 20 December 2015 and the second on or before 20 February 2016. In case of default, the Motion was to stand dismissed and the Plaintiff could execute the decree. The first installment fell due on 20 December 2015, which was a Sunday. The Defendants applied for a demand draft on the following Monday, 21 December 2015, and received it on 22 December 2015. The Plaintiff refused to accept the draft citing delay. The Defendants sought condonation of the two-day delay or extension of time under Section 148 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The Plaintiff opposed, arguing that without her consent, the court cannot extend time. The court held that it has the power under Section 148 CPC to extend time for payment even in a consent decree, provided the extension is reasonable and does not alter the substance of the decree. The court found that the delay of two days was caused by the due date falling on a Sunday and the time taken by the bank to issue the draft, which was a reasonable cause. The court extended the time for payment of the first installment by two days, i.e., up to 22 December 2015, and directed the Plaintiff to accept the demand draft. The court also clarified that the second installment remains payable on or before 20 February 2016.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Extension of Time - Section 148 CPC - Consent Decree - Default - Court has power to extend time for payment under Section 148 CPC even in a consent decree, provided the extension is for a reasonable period and does not alter the substance of the decree - The court's power under Section 148 is not ousted merely because the decree is based on consent terms - Held that the court can condone a short delay of two days caused by a Sunday and bank processing time, as it is a reasonable extension (Paras 1-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Court has jurisdiction and power to grant extension of time for payment of decretal amount under Section 148 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, in a consent decree, when the plaintiff opposes such extension.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the Defendants' application for extension of time under Section 148 CPC. The time for payment of the first installment of Rs.45 lakhs was extended by two days, i.e., up to 22 December 2015. The Plaintiff was directed to accept the demand draft of Rs.45 lakhs tendered by the Defendants. The second installment remains payable on or before 20 February 2016.

Law Points

  • Section 148 CPC
  • extension of time
  • consent decree
  • compromise decree
  • inherent power of court
  • default clause
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (BOM) (08) 137

Notice of Motion No.1487 of 2014 in Summary Suit No.906 of 2011

2016-08-30

S.C. Gupte, J.

Mr. Karl Tamboly i/b E.A. Sasi for the Plaintiff, Mr. Rohaan Cama i/b Pavan Patil for Defendants/Applicants

M/s Rachana Developers And Marketing And Others

Sonal Deepak Shah

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Notice of Motion for setting aside ex parte decree and subsequent consent terms; dispute over extension of time for payment under consent decree.

Remedy Sought

Defendants sought condonation of two-day delay in payment of first installment under consent terms, or extension of time under Section 148 CPC.

Filing Reason

Defendants defaulted in paying the first installment on the due date (20 December 2015, a Sunday) and paid on 22 December 2015; Plaintiff refused to accept payment citing delay.

Previous Decisions

Ex parte decree dated 19 December 2012 in Summary Suit No.906 of 2011; consent terms filed on 19 November 2015 disposing of the Notice of Motion.

Issues

Whether the Court has power under Section 148 CPC to extend time for payment in a consent decree without the consent of the decree-holder.

Submissions/Arguments

Plaintiff argued that time fixed for payment in a decree cannot be extended unilaterally by the court, and a compromise decree cannot be modified without parties' agreement. Defendants argued that consent terms merged into the court's order, and the court has inherent power to extend time under Section 148 CPC.

Ratio Decidendi

The court has power under Section 148 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, to extend time for payment of a decretal amount even in a consent decree, provided the extension is for a reasonable period and does not alter the substance of the decree. The power is not ousted merely because the decree is based on consent terms. A short delay caused by a Sunday and bank processing time constitutes reasonable cause for extension.

Judgment Excerpts

The question, thus, is of jurisdiction and power of the Court to grant extension of time for payment of decretal amount in a contested matter. The court has power under Section 148 CPC to extend time for payment even in a consent decree, provided the extension is reasonable and does not alter the substance of the decree.

Procedural History

Summary Suit No.906 of 2011 filed by Plaintiff; ex parte decree passed on 19 December 2012; Defendants filed Notice of Motion No.1487 of 2014 to set aside decree; on 19 November 2015, parties filed consent terms and Motion was disposed of; Defendants defaulted on first installment due 20 December 2015; Defendants paid on 22 December 2015; Plaintiff refused; Defendants sought extension under Section 148 CPC; present order dated 30 August 2016.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 148
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging School Tribunal's Order on Date of Birth Correction for Pensionary Benefits. Court upholds Tribunal's finding that petitioner's actual date of birth is 15.09.1960 based on school records, rejecting the...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Extends Time for Payment Under Section 148 CPC Despite Plaintiff's Objection in Consent Decree Default Case. Court holds that Section 148 CPC empowers the court to extend time for payment in a consent decree for reasonable cause, ev...