Search Results for "Customs and Central Excise Department"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Challenge to Appointment Norms of Information Commissioners ...
Supreme Court Refers to Larger Bench the Question of Quashing Non-Compoundable O...

Search Results for "Customs and Central Excise Department"

545 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 545 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Madras Converts Writ Petition into Suo Motu Public Interest Litigation for Investigation into Illegal Beach Sand Mining. The Court Clarifies that the Scope Covers All Beach Sand Minerals and that Amendments to MMDR Act, 1957 and Atomic Concession Rules, 2016 Do Not Render the PIL Infructuous for the Period Prior to 2016.

17 Feb 2025

The case originated as a writ petition filed by Dr. G. Victor Rajamanickam concerning allegations of massive illegal mining and sale of Beach Sand Min...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Central Excise Valuation Case — Related Party Transactions Must Be Valued Under Rule 11 CEVR Read with Section 4(1)(b) of Central Excise Act, 1944. Circular dated 01.07.2002 Clarifying Valuation Method for Mixed Sales to Related and Unrelated Parties Is Binding and Correctly Applied by Revenue.

5 Dec 2022

The present Civil Appeal arises from an order dated 30.11.2017 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chandigarh, ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Manufacturer's Appeal in Rebate Claim Case Due to Limitation Under Section 11B of Central Excise Act. Rebate of duty on exports is governed by the limitation period prescribed under Section 11B, as 'refund' includes 'rebate' under Explanation (A) to that section.

29 Nov 2022

The appellant, Sansera Engineering Limited, a manufacturer of excisable goods, exported goods between August 2015 and October 2015 and filed claims fo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Interest on Delayed Refund of CENVAT Credit Under Section 11BB of Central Excise Act, 1944. Petitioner entitled to interest from expiry of three months from date of refund application till actual refund.

21 May 2021

The petitioner, Qualcomm India Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, is engaged in providing support services to its ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in Excise Incentive Withdrawal Case — Policy Change Upheld as Prospective and in Public Interest. The Court held that the impugned notification was not retrospective and promissory estoppel did not bar the government from modifying the incentive scheme for Kutch industries.

1 Jan 2020

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the Union of India against the common judgment of the Gujarat High Court, which had quashed Notificatio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in MVAT Classification Dispute — Multi Function Printers Held Classifiable as Automatic Data Processing Machines Under Entry 84.71. The Court ruled that multi function printers with copying, printing, scanning, and faxing capabilities are classifiable as automatic data processing machines or units thereof under Entry 84.71 of the VAT Notification, not as laser jet printers or under residual entry.

20 Dec 2018

The appellant, Ricoh India Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, filed an appeal under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 200...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Suspension of Customs Broker License for Violation of Natural Justice — Ex-Parte Order Without Show Cause Notice Set Aside. The court held that suspension under Regulation 23 of CBLR, 2013 without affording opportunity of hearing is illegal and directed fresh consideration after show cause notice.

21 Nov 2017

The petitioner, M/s Capricorn Logistics Pvt. Ltd., a Customs Broker, challenged an order dated 13.11.2017 passed by the Commissioner of Customs, Banga...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Denial of Denatured Spirit License for Industrial Use. Held that rectified spirit/denatured spirit is not 'intoxicating liquor' under the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 and that the State cannot refuse license for industrial use under the Bombay Denatured Spirit, Methyl Alcohol and Varnish (Miscellaneous) Rules, 1954.

27 Feb 2017

The petitioners, M/s. Biostar Pharmaceuticals Limited and Mr. Ashok Bora, filed two writ petitions challenging the refusal of the State Excise authori...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Proceedings Against Legal Heir for Company's Central Excise Dues Without Proper Adjudication. Personal Liability Cannot Be Imposed on Legal Representative Without Determining Liability Under Section 11 of Central Excise Act, 1944.

13 Feb 2012

The petitioner, Vandana Bidyut Chaterjee, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging various notices and communi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Department's Appeal, Holds CESTAT Has Power to Condon Delay Under Section 129A(5) of Customs Act, 1962. The Court Remanded the Matter for Consideration of Condonation of Delay on Merits, Ruling That Appeals Under Section 129D(3) Are Deemed Appeals Under Section 129A and Thus Subject to the Same Condonation Power.

13 Aug 2010

The Commissioner of Customs (Gen), Mumbai, filed an appeal before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) against an order of ...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)