Search Results for "Central Motor Vehicle Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Central Motor Vehicle Rules"

278 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 278 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Culpability for BMW Hit-and-Run: State Appeals Against High Court's Reduction of Conviction from Section 304 Part II to Section 304A IPC. The Core Issue is Whether the Accused Had Knowledge of Likely Death to Attract the Graver Offence.

1 Aug 2026

The case arose from a fatal motor accident involving a BMW car driven by the respondent, Sanjeev Nanda, on the night of 9/10 January 1999 in New Delhi...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Appeal by Regional Transport Officer in Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Matter — Vehicle Classification as Transport Vehicle Affirmed. Division Bench Holds that N1 Category Vehicle Used for Carriage of Goods Must Be Registered as Transport Vehicle Under Section 2(47) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Rule 2(p) of Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989.

20 Jul 2026

The dispute centered on the registration classification of a Mahindra Bolero Camper 4WD PSD vehicle purchased by the respondent, Dhilip Kumar. The veh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Cancellation of Vehicle Registration in Customs Duty Evasion Case — Petitioner Not a Bona Fide Purchaser Without Notice. Registration Cancellation Under Section 55(5) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Upheld as Vehicle Was Fraudulently Imported Availing Customs Duty Exemption for Diplomatic Officer.

2 Dec 2025

The petitioner, Imran Humayun Chandiwala, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 9 September ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Owner with Valid Learner's Licence Not Liable for Compensation; Insurance Company Directed to Pay and Recover. Learner's Licence Held Valid Driving Licence Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988; Breach of Rule 3 of Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 Not Established as No Evidence of Contravention.

3 Feb 2025

The appellant, Ku. Nilima Dakhane, was the owner of a Kinetic Nova scooter involved in an accident on 10.04.2003, in which respondent No.2, Pandurang ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Insurance Company's Appeal and Dismisses Claimant's Appeal in Motor Accident Compensation Case — Reduces Compensation from Rs.1,67,040 to Rs.1,47,040 Due to Lack of Evidence on Future Medical Expenses. The court held that future medical expenses cannot be awarded without medical evidence under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

5 Jul 2024

The case involves two appeals arising from a motor accident claim. The claimant, Chowdappa, sustained injuries in a road accident and filed a claim pe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of PSI Appointment for Lack of Driving License on Cut-off Date. Essential Qualification Must Be Possessed by Cut-off Date, Not Subsequently Acquired.

26 Jun 2023

The petitioner, Prachi Rama Varak, applied for the post of Police Sub Inspector (Female) in the Goa Police Department pursuant to an advertisement dat...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Refers Driving Licence Validity Dispute to Larger Bench for Reconsideration of Mukund Dewangan Precedent. Issue Involves Interpretation of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Provisions on Whether Light Motor Vehicle Licence Covers Transport Vehicle Without Endorsement, Noting Unconsidered Statutory Distinctions.

8 Mar 2022

The Supreme Court was seized of a reference made by a Two-Judge Bench in Civil Appeal No. 841 of 2018 and connected matters, concerning the interpreta...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Owner in Motor Accident Claim — Insurance Company Liable Despite Invalid Driving Licence Due to Lack of Owner's Knowledge. Employer Not Required to Verify Licence Validity for Transport Vehicle When Driver Produced Licence.

23 Aug 2019

The appeal arises from a judgment of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT), Chandrapur, in Motor Accident Claims Petition No. 120/2006. The deceas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows PIL Seeking Directions to Motor Accidents Claims Tribunals for Compliance with Procedural Rules. Court Holds That Insistence on Personal Appearance of Claimants at Filing Is Not Mandatory Under Rule 254(2) of Maharashtra Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989.

21 Dec 2016

This Public Interest Litigation was filed by Anil Prabhakar Tadkalkar, a practicing advocate, raising several issues concerning the disposal of claim ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 5 TADA for Possession of Weapon. Appellant Challenges Recovery Evidence and Disclosure Statement in Bombay Blast Case.

1 Jan 1970

...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)