Search Results for "Brand new goods"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "Brand new goods"

146 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 146 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition for Lack of Willful Disobedience in IP Infringement Case. Court finds that the alleged new label/trade dress of the respondents was not identical or deceptively similar to the petitioner's FEVICOL MR artistic work, bottle, and glue pens, and thus did not violate the consent decree.

13 Aug 2024

The petitioner, Pidilite Industries Ltd., filed a contempt petition against the respondents, Premier Stationery Industries Pvt. Ltd. and others, alleg...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Heinz India and GSK, Classifies Nycil Prickly Heat Powder as Medicated Talcum Powder Under Sales Tax Acts. Product Held Not to Be Medicine Despite Medicinal Properties Due to Specific Statutory Entries Including Medicated Talcum Powder Under Entry 127 of KGST Act and Toilet Powder Under Entry 1(iii) of TNGST Act.

4 May 2023

The Supreme Court dealt with appeals concerning the classification of Nycil Prickly Heat Powder under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 (KGST Act...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Case in Trademark Dispute Due to Civil Nature of Dispute and Lack of Criminal Intent. Allegations of deceptive similarity in tea packaging held to be primarily a civil trademark infringement matter, not warranting criminal prosecution under Sections 420, 34 IPC and Sections 27, 28, 103, 104 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

24 Sep 2018

The Bombay High Court, at its Aurangabad bench, considered a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking q...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — Appellant's Registered Mark 'Nandi' Entitled to Protection Against Deceptively Similar Mark 'Nandini'. Prior Registration and Deceptive Similarity Establish Prima Facie Case for Injunction Under Sections 28, 29, 134, 135 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

17 Jul 2017

The appellant, Micro Hitech Industries, a sole proprietorship represented by its Karta and Proprietor Sri Goutam Kumar Babulal, filed a suit for perma...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Injunction Against Defendant in Trademark Infringement Case — 'Cothagiri' Mark Deceptively Similar to 'Cothas'. Court Restrains Defendant from Using Mark 'Cothagiri' for Coffee Products, Finding Prima Facie Case of Passing Off Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

14 Sep 2016

The case involves a trademark dispute between M/s. Cothas Coffee Co. (plaintiff/respondent) and M/s. Avighna Coffee Pvt. Ltd. (defendant/appellant). T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Suit for Trade Mark Infringement and Passing Off Against Defendants Over 'SUNCONTROL' Mark. The Court held that 'SUNCONTROL' is descriptive and not distinctive, and that the plaintiff failed to establish secondary meaning or likelihood of confusion.

12 Jul 2016

The plaintiff, Garware Polyester Limited, filed a suit for trade mark infringement and passing off against 3M Company and 3M India Limited, alleging t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Franchisee's Section 9 Petition for Interim Relief in Franchise Dispute. Court holds that arbitration clause providing for three arbitrators with franchisor appointing one arbitrator is valid and not unconscionable, and that Section 9 petition is not maintainable as the arbitration agreement provides for a specific mechanism for appointment of arbitrators.

13 Feb 2012

The petitioner, Karan Sahgal, a franchisee, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking interim relief agai...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit Involving Beer Labels. Plaintiff's mark 'HAYWARDS 5000' held to be infringed by defendant's use of '5000' in similar label, as numeral is an essential feature not descriptive of beer strength.

5 Sep 2011

The plaintiff, Skol Breweries Limited, filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against the defendants, Som Distilleries & Breweries Li...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Quashing of Process in Tobacco Advertisement Case — Held That Complaint Under Section 5 of Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act, 2003 Is Maintainable Against Individuals and Companies for Prohibited Advertisement of Tobacco Products. The Court restored the process issued by the Magistrate, finding that the Sessions Judge erred in quashing the process by conducting a mini-trial at the stage of process.

30 Jul 2010

The petitioner, National Organisation for Tobacco Eradication (NOTE), a registered society, filed a criminal complaint against the respondents (accuse...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Trademark Infringement Suit Over Numeral '5000' in Beer Labels — No Deceptive Similarity Found Between 'HAYWARDS 5000' and 'PRESTIGE 5000' or 'FOUR SQUARE 5000'. The numeral '5000' was held to be descriptive of beer strength, not an essential feature capable of exclusive appropriation under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

5 Apr 2006

The Plaintiffs, Shaw Wallace and Company Ltd. and another, filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against Mohan Rocky Spring Water Br...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)