Bombay High Court Dismisses Trademark Infringement Suit Over Numeral '5000' in Beer Labels — No Deceptive Similarity Found Between 'HAYWARDS 5000' and 'PRESTIGE 5000' or 'FOUR SQUARE 5000'. The numeral '5000' was held to be descriptive of beer strength, not an essential feature capable of exclusive appropriation under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 142
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Plaintiffs, Shaw Wallace and Company Ltd. and another, filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against Mohan Rocky Spring Water Breweries Ltd. The Plaintiffs claimed to be the registered proprietor of the label mark bearing No.436744, which includes the numeral '5000' as an essential feature. They alleged that the Defendant's use of the trade marks 'PRESTIGE 5000' and 'FOUR SQUARE 5000' for beer infringed their registered mark and amounted to passing off. The Plaintiffs had adopted the mark 'HAYWARDS 5000' in 1983 for strong beer, and the numeral '5000' was claimed to be a fancy numeral without reference to quality. The Defendant contended that '5000' is descriptive of the strength of beer and that their marks were distinct in overall appearance, get-up, and trade name. The Court analyzed the marks and found that the numeral '5000' is commonly used in the beer industry to denote strength and is not an essential feature of the Plaintiffs' mark. The competing marks were not deceptively similar, as the labels, trade names, and overall impressions were different. The Court held that the Plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case for infringement or passing off, and the balance of convenience did not favor granting an interim injunction. Consequently, the Notice of Motion was dismissed.

Headnote

A) Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Infringement - Section 28, 29 - Essential Feature - Numeral '5000' - The Plaintiffs claimed exclusive rights over the numeral '5000' as an essential feature of their registered label mark 'HAYWARDS 5000'. The Court held that the numeral '5000' is descriptive of the strength of beer and not an essential feature capable of exclusive appropriation. The Defendant's marks 'PRESTIGE 5000' and 'FOUR SQUARE 5000' were found not deceptively similar to the Plaintiffs' mark, as the overall label, get-up, and trade name were different. The Court dismissed the Notice of Motion, refusing interim injunction. (Paras 1-10)

B) Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Passing Off - Deceptive Similarity - The Plaintiffs alleged passing off by the Defendant using the numeral '5000'. The Court held that the Plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case of deceptive similarity or likelihood of confusion, as the competing marks were visually and phonetically distinct. The numeral '5000' being descriptive, no monopoly could be claimed. (Paras 11-15)

C) Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Interim Injunction - Prima Facie Case - Balance of Convenience - The Court found that the Plaintiffs did not make out a strong prima facie case for infringement or passing off. The balance of convenience was in favor of the Defendant, as the Plaintiffs had not used the numeral '5000' exclusively and the Defendant had been using its marks for a considerable period. The Notice of Motion was dismissed. (Paras 16-20)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the use of the numeral '5000' by the Defendant in its trade marks 'PRESTIGE 5000' and 'FOUR SQUARE 5000' amounts to infringement of the Plaintiffs' registered trade mark 'HAYWARDS 5000' and passing off, and whether the Plaintiffs are entitled to an interim injunction.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Notice of Motion is dismissed. The Plaintiffs are not entitled to any interim relief. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Trademark infringement
  • passing off
  • deceptive similarity
  • essential feature
  • numeral mark
  • descriptive mark
  • Section 28 Trade Marks Act 1999
  • Section 29 Trade Marks Act 1999
  • Section 2(1)(zb) Trade Marks Act 1999
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2006:BHC-OS:4186

Notice of Motion No.3480 of 2004 in Suit No.3443 of 2004

2006-04-05

D.K. Deshmukh, J.

2006:BHC-OS:4186

Dr. Virendra Tulzapurkar, Senior Counsel i/b Mr. H.W. Kane for Plaintiffs; Mr. Rohit Kapadia, Sr. Counsel with Mr. Milind Vasudeo i/b Mr. S.J. Khera for Defendant

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Suit for trademark infringement and passing off with Notice of Motion for interim injunction.

Remedy Sought

Plaintiffs sought interim injunction restraining the Defendant from using the trade marks 'PRESTIGE 5000' and 'FOUR SQUARE 5000' or any other mark containing the numeral '5000'.

Filing Reason

Plaintiffs alleged that the Defendant's use of the numeral '5000' in its trade marks infringed their registered label mark 'HAYWARDS 5000' and amounted to passing off.

Issues

Whether the use of the numeral '5000' by the Defendant constitutes infringement of the Plaintiffs' registered trade mark 'HAYWARDS 5000' under Section 29 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999. Whether the Defendant's use of '5000' amounts to passing off. Whether the Plaintiffs are entitled to an interim injunction.

Submissions/Arguments

Plaintiffs argued that the numeral '5000' is an essential feature of their registered label mark and that the Defendant's marks are deceptively similar, causing confusion among consumers. Defendant contended that '5000' is descriptive of the strength of beer and is commonly used in the trade, and that the overall marks are distinct and not likely to cause confusion.

Ratio Decidendi

The numeral '5000' is descriptive of the strength of beer and not an essential feature of the Plaintiffs' mark. The Defendant's marks are not deceptively similar to the Plaintiffs' mark. Therefore, no prima facie case for infringement or passing off is made out, and the balance of convenience does not favor granting an interim injunction.

Judgment Excerpts

The numeral '5000' is descriptive of the strength of beer and not an essential feature of the Plaintiffs' mark. The Defendant's marks 'PRESTIGE 5000' and 'FOUR SQUARE 5000' are not deceptively similar to the Plaintiffs' mark 'HAYWARDS 5000'.

Procedural History

The Plaintiffs filed Suit No.3443 of 2004 for trademark infringement and passing off, and took out Notice of Motion No.3480 of 2004 seeking interim injunction. The Notice of Motion was heard and dismissed by the High Court on 5th April 2006.

Acts & Sections

  • Trade Marks Act, 1999: 28, 29, 2(1)(zb)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Redevelopment of Co-operative Housing Society in CRZ-II Area Without Prior CRZ Clearance Under 2011 Notification — Stop Work Notice Quashed. The court held that para 8(iii) of the CRZ Notification 2011 permits redevelopment...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Trademark Infringement Suit Over Numeral '5000' in Beer Labels — No Deceptive Similarity Found Between 'HAYWARDS 5000' and 'PRESTIGE 5000' or 'FOUR SQUARE 5000'. The numeral '5000' was held to be descriptive of beer stre...