Search Results for "Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958"

206 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 206 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Collector's Power to Determine Pre-Election Disqualification Under Section 16 of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act — Disqualification of Underage Sarpanch Upheld

8 Mar 2018

The case involves a writ petition filed by Sau. Jaya Santosh Arbat, who was elected as Sarpanch of Gat Gram Panchayat, Devarda, but was disqualified b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Commissioner's Order Setting Aside Disqualification of Gram Panchayat Member for Having More Than Two Living Children. The court held that under Section 14(1)(j-1) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958, the birth of a third child after the cutoff date attracts disqualification even if the child dies before the election.

21 Dec 2016

The petitioner, Dalpat Totaram Kshirsagar, challenged the order of the Additional Commissioner, Amravati Division, dated 15-5-2014, which set aside th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Village Panchayat Election Dispute — No Appeal Lies Against Collector's Order Under Section 33(5) of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958. The court held that the Collector's order under Section 33(5) is final and no appeal lies to the Commissioner.

19 Jan 2010

The appellant, Ashok Sitaram Misal, contested the election for the post of Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Kukkadgaon held on 11/10/2008. Respondent No.3, M...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Disqualify Panchayat Member for Having More Than Two Children Under Section 14(b) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act. The Court held that the disqualification provision applies to any person having more than two children, regardless of whether the children are from the same spouse or different relationships, and that the Collector's order rejecting the disqualification application was perverse and unsustainable.

23 Mar 2022

The Petitioner, Shri Tanaji Jagannath Palave, an elected Member of Panchayat Samiti from Ward No.5 of Village Panchayat Mandave, filed a writ petition...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Disqualification of Panchayat Member for Non-Disclosure of Property Tax Dues. Failure to disclose outstanding property tax dues and obtain no-dues certificate renders election void under Section 14(1)(j) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

18 Dec 2013

The petitioner, Shaukat Ali Mohd. Hussain, challenged the election of respondent No. 1, Shaikh Ayub, as a member of the village panchayat of Badnapur ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Gram Panchayat Disqualification Case — Non-Payment of Taxes Not a Continuing Disqualification Under Section 14(1)(h) of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958. The court held that disqualification ceases once tax is paid within six months from the date of the bill, and payment before the disqualification application is decided cures the default.

13 Jul 2006

The case involves an appeal against an order of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dismissing a writ petition that challenged the disqual...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Setting Aside of Gram Panchayat Election for Non-Compliance with Reservation Rotation Policy. The court upheld the trial court's decision that the election of petitioners was invalid due to failure to rotate reserved seats as per Section 12 and 14 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 read with Rule 4 of the Bombay Village Panchayats (Reservation of Seats and Rotation of Reserved Seats) Rules, 1964.

27 Aug 2015

The case pertains to a writ petition filed by Jagarao Raising Ade and Sau. Raubai Bhikaji Landge challenging the judgment of the Civil Judge, Junior D...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Gram Panchayat Member Challenging Disqualification as Gram Rojgar Sevak. Post of Gram Rojgar Sevak under MGNREGA is not an office of profit under Section 14(1)(f) or (g) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958.

30 Mar 2026

The petitioner, Santosh Jagannath Galbe, was an elected member of the Village Panchayat, Devegaon, Parbhani, and also worked as a Gram Rojgar Sevak un...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of State Amendment Reducing Gram Panchayat Members in Public Interest Litigation. The amendment to Section 10 of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961, reducing the number of elected members from 15 to 7, is held valid and not violative of Article 243G of the Constitution.

10 Nov 2014

The judgment pertains to a Public Interest Litigation filed by five residents of Morewadi and Panchgaon in Kolhapur district, challenging the constitu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Sarpanch's Petition Challenging No Confidence Motion Meeting — Fresh Meeting Barred Within One Year Under Section 35(3-A) of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958. The court held that the embargo on holding a fresh no confidence motion meeting applies for a full year from the date of the last meeting, and a meeting held exactly one year later is not permissible.

21 Feb 2017

The petitioner, Smt. Laxmibai Kiran Jaiswar, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Kankrala. Certain members of the Grampanchayat sought to move a No Conf...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)