Search Results for "prior High Court permission"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "prior High Court permission"

5191 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5191 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Passes Interim Orders to Curb Illegal Mining in Odisha and Directs Central Empowered Committee to Identify Violating Lessees. Mining Operations Require Mandatory Clearances Under Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and Environment (Protection) Act, 1986; Non-Compliance Renders Operations Illegal and Subject to Immediate Intervention Under Article 32.

1 Aug 2026

Two writ petitions were filed under Article 32 of the Constitution by Common Cause and by Prafulla Samantra and Anr. against the Union of India and ot...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Bank in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Reinstatement of Daily Wager Denied Due to Lack of Continuous Service. Employee failed to prove 240 days of continuous service in preceding year, disentitling him to protection under Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

5 Jan 2016

The present Letters Patent Appeal was filed by the Nagpur District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. (the appellant) challenging the judgment of a learne...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Orders Central Empowered Committee to Identify Mining Leases Operating in Violation of Environmental and Forest Laws in Odisha. Court Finds Prima Facie Case of Illegal Mining and Directs Preparation of List of Defaulting Lessees for Interim Relief Under Article 32.

1 Aug 2026

The writ petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution were filed by Common Cause and Prafulla Samantra, alleging rampant illegal mining in the Keonj...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Order Dismissing Application for Return of Plaint in Commercial Suit — Territorial Jurisdiction of Commercial Court Determined by Principal Civil Court Under Section 2(1)(c)(vii) of Commercial Courts Act, 2015. The Court held that since the suit property was situated in England and no cause of action arose in Bengaluru, the Commercial Court lacked territorial jurisdiction, and the plaint must be returned for presentation before the competent court.

8 Jul 2025

The petitioners, M/s Tefilah Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. and its Managing Director Siddhartha Gupta, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Dispute, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Fact. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC when findings are based on appreciation of evidence and not perverse.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves two second appeals arising from a property dispute between the legal heirs of Madhavrao Ramchandra More (appellants in SA/66/2003 an...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reviews Its Own Guidelines on Arrest and Anticipatory Bail Under SC/ST Act. Directions Requiring Preliminary Enquiry and Approval for Arrest Quashed as Legislative Overreach, but Anticipatory Bail Direction Upheld.

1 Oct 2019

The Union of India filed a review petition against the Supreme Court's judgment dated 20.3.2018 in Criminal Appeal No.416 of 2018, which had issued gu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals in Property Suit — Upholds Refusal to Strike Out Defence Under Order 8 Rule 10 CPC for Failure to File Written Statement Within 90 Days. The court held that the power to strike out defence is discretionary and not automatic, and that non-disclosure of defence under Order 6A Rule 3 CPC does not justify striking out.

21 Dec 2017

The present appeals arise from a suit filed in 1987 by Behram Nowrosji Gamadia and Jehangir Dhan Mistri (original plaintiffs) against several defendan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Refusal to Reject Plaint in Suit for Conveyance and Amenities. Plaint Disclosed Cause of Action and Claim for Conveyance is Continuing Cause of Action Not Barred by Limitation.

28 Jan 2021

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the applicants (defendants in the suit) challenging the order of the learned Senior Civil Judg...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Arbitration Petitions Challenging Arbitral Awards in Real Estate Development Dispute — Awards Dated 22-23 April 2022 in Favour of Claimants. Court considers whether awards passed under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in relation to allotment and development of plots in Arrow City Manhattan Project are liable to be set aside, especially given arbitrator's adoption of findings from Claim No.5 across other claims.

21 Feb 2024

The Bombay High Court heard a batch of connected arbitration petitions filed by Arrow Engineering Limited challenging arbitral awards passed in favour...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Orders Partial Release of Goods from Court Receiver's Custody in Section 9 Arbitration Petition. Goods Not Included in Petitioner's Claim List Released on Petitioner's Consent, Pending Determination of Third-Party's Bona Fide Purchaser Status.

22 Oct 2019

JSW Steel Limited entered into a Franchise Agreement dated 1 July 2018 with three sister concerns (Delta Iron & Steel Co. Pvt. Ltd., Yatin Steels Indi...

67 68 69 70 71

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)