Search Results for "implied compliance"

814 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 814 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Reinstatement and Back Wages for Employee Terminated Without Notice in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Employer's Failure to Prove Abandonment of Service and Non-Compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Renders Termination Illegal.

The case involves a writ petition filed by Goodlass Nerolac Paints Limited under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an award of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Daily Wager Employees in Maharashtra Water Supply Department. Employees Appointed Without Following Recruitment Rules and Without Approval of Competent Authority Cannot Claim Regularisation or Reinstatement.

The petitioners, ten individuals, were appointed as daily wagers in the Water Supply and Sanitation Department, Maharashtra. They challenged their ter...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Share Purchase Agreement Dispute. Court upholds award directing payment of consideration for shares, finding no patent illegality or conflict with public policy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Petitioner, Sonoma Management Partners Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions of Sweepers Challenging Termination Without Inquiry. Termination of daily-wage sweepers by Municipal Council set aside for violation of Model Standing Orders and principles of natural justice.

The petitioners, Ram Pyarelal Khicher and Sunita Raju Paisadeli, were employed as sweepers by the Municipal Council, Ramtek. Ram was appointed on 8.12...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Broker-Client Dispute. Court Upholds Award Directing Payment of Rs.1,58,39,459.87 but Refuses Interest and Costs Under Section 34 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, Harinarayan Bajaj, entered into various share transactions on the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) through the respondent, Madhukar Sheth, w...