KAHC010366622012_1
21 Jun 2016...
Search Results for "consumer complaint"
734 result(s) found
Found 734 result(s)
High Court
- 71
High Court
High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru Examines Challenge to Advocate General’s Refusal of Consent for Criminal Contempt Proceedings Under Section 15(1)(b) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. Writ Petition Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution Alleges Non-Application of Mind and Abuse of Process of Court by Respondents in Property Dispute.
18 Sep 2019The writ petition arises from a property dispute concerning Sy.No.200/2 at Kudlu Village, Bengaluru. The petitioner, H. Munireddy, alleged that respon...
- 80
High Court
Karnataka High Court Quashes Bar Council of India’s Gag Order on Advocates for Infringing Fundamental Right to Speech. The Court Holds That Neither the Bar Council of India Nor Its Chairman Possess Power Under the Advocates Act, 1961 to Restrain Advocates from Making Public Statements, Rendering the Order Void Ab Initio.
27 Sep 2024The petitioner, a practicing advocate and member of the Karnataka State Bar Council, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of In...
- 38
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation for Directions to Provide Hygienic Public Toilets to Women Walking on Streets. Obligatory Duty of Municipal Corporations to Construct and Maintain Latrines Under Section 63 and 61 of Respective Acts Held Inseparable from Right to Life with Dignity.
23 Dec 2015A public interest litigation was filed in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, raising critical issu...
- 68
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Hears First Appeal Against Dismissal of Suit for Rs.1.45 Crore Insurance Claim for Vessel Capsizing - Court Examines Peril of the Sea Coverage Under Marine Hull Policy. Appellant sought decree for total loss and sue and labour expenses, contending that ingress of sea water from grounding constituted a covered peril; respondent disputed proximate cause and repudiated claim.
8 May 2014The appeal arose from a judgment of the Civil Judge Senior Division, Panaji, which dismissed Special Civil Suit No. 105/90. The appellant, a salvage c...
- 49
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Auction of Property Under MPID Act — Petitioner Cannot Challenge Auction After Being Declared Successful Bidder. Court Held That Petitioner's Own Conduct of Participating in Auction with Knowledge of Attachments and Seeking Specific Performance Before MPID Court Precludes Challenge Under Article 226.
25 Oct 2024The petitioner, Lemon Seeds Hospitality Pvt. Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of th...
- 796
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Holds Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrators Violates Equality Principle Under Section 18 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Party Autonomy Cannot Override Mandatory Requirement of Independence and Impartiality, and Unilateral Appointment Clauses in Public-Private Contracts Are Unconscionable and Void.
13 Nov 2024The Supreme Court of India, in a Constitution Bench judgment, addressed the validity of unilateral appointment of arbitrators under the Arbitration an...
- 931
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Directs States to Ensure Basic Toilet Facilities in All Court Premises Under Article 21 — Right to Dignity Includes Access to Sanitation. The Court held that the right to life under Article 21 encompasses the right to sanitation, and the State must provide and maintain clean, accessible toilets for all genders including transgender persons and persons with disabilities in all court complexes.
17 Feb 2025The petitioner, a practicing advocate, filed a public interest litigation under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking directions to all States and Un...
- 1067
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Clarifies Direction on Marking Appearances of Advocates in Court Proceedings - CBI Investigation to Remain Independent. The court held that the right to practice under Section 30 of the Advocates Act, 1961 is not absolute and the direction requiring Advocates-on-Record to mark appearances only of authorized advocates does not infringe any legal rights.
13 Feb 2025The Supreme Court disposed of miscellaneous applications filed by the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) and the Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record A...
- 2922
