Search Results for "blood group evidence"

1227 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1227 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Intent and Doubtful Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as the incident arose from a sudden quarrel without premeditation, reducing offence to culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

The appellant, Panjab Onkarrao Sagole, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Achalpur, for the murder of his brother Avinash under Section 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeal of Convicted Husband for Murder of Wife Under Section 302 IPC. Appellant Challenges Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Testimony of Interested Witnesses.

The appellant, Syed Sahil @ Krishnamurthy, was convicted by the Trial Court for the murder of his wife, Seema Thasleem, under Section 302 IPC. The cou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Robbery Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Last Seen Theory. Appellant convicted under Sections 302, 392, 397 IPC for killing a labourer and robbing him, with conviction affirmed on appeal.

The appellant, Dinesh @ Dhebarya Virendra Bhatkar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bombay, for the murder and robbery of Yellappa, a l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The present appeal challenges the legality of the judgment and order dated 22.08.2013 passed by the learned Sessions Court, Pune, in Sessions Case No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeal Against Conviction for Murder and Causing Disappearance of Evidence. The appeal challenges the trial court's reliance on circumstantial evidence and FSL report in convicting the accused under Sections 302 and 201 IPC.

Background: A criminal appeal was filed by the appellant against his conviction and sentence for offences under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Pen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f) IPC set aside as medical evidence did not support rape and prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Girjesh Rajendra Prasad, was convicted by the Second Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Kalyan, in Sessions Case No.161/2004 for the off...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Extra-Judicial Confession and Incomplete Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Ramesh and Mukinda Sabhadinde, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Washim for the murder of their father Ramchandra under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Rajesh Bhaurao Sadanshiv, was convicted by the 2nd Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Akola in Sessions Trial No. 153 of 2005 for the mu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Failure to Prove Motive. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish chain of circumstances beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Bajirao @ Ramesh Suresh Kodre, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of Raju @ Chandrashekhar P...