Search Results for "assessee company"

1421 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1421 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Department's Appeal in Part, Upholds Revenue Treatment of Transformer Repairs. Expenditure on repairs of damaged transformer held to be current repairs under Section 31 of Income Tax Act, 1961, not capital expenditure.

The case involves three Income Tax Appeals filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Nagpur, under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Penalty Under Section 10(b) of CST Act for Alleged Misuse of C-Forms. The Court Examined Whether Penalty is Leviable When Goods Were Covered in Registration Certificate and There Was No Dishonest Intention.

The combined proceeding involved appeals and revision petitions against orders relating to penalty under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. Two dealers,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Legality of Penalty Imposed Under Section 10(b) of CST Act for Misuse of C-Forms in Cement Industry. Court Examines Whether Penalty is Sustainable When Purchased Goods Are Included in Registration Certificate and Used for Purposes Other Than Manufacturing.

The High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench, heard a sales tax appeal and connected revision petitions concerning the levy of penalty under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening Based on Same Facts as Original Assessment Without New Tangible Material is Invalid.

The petitioner, Noshir Darabshaw Talati, an individual assessed to income tax for over three decades, filed his return of income for Assessment Year 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in CENVAT Credit Case — Amendment to Rule 6 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 Held Not Retrospective. CESTAT order allowing respondent's appeal upheld as the retrospective amendment by Finance Act, 2010 did not apply to the period prior to its enactment.

The appeal was filed by the Principal Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, Mumbai East Commissionerate against Larsen & Toubro Limited (HED) under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material. Assessment Completed Under Section 143(3) Cannot Be Reopened Based on Same Material Already Considered.

The petitioner, Regency Nirman Ltd., a company engaged in real estate development, filed its return of income for the assessment year 2013-14 on 29th ...