Search Results for "Section 236"

712 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 712 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging State Notification Declaring Public Holiday for Zilla Panchayat Elections in Private Establishments. State Government Has Power Under Section 25 of the Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 to Declare Public Holiday for Elections.

The petitioner, M/s M. R. F. Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, challenged a notification dated 09/03/2015 issued by the Sta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Revision Against Impleadment of Proprietor's Wife in Money Suit. Order I Rule 10(2) CPC Allows Impleadment of Necessary Party for Effective Adjudication of Dispute Arising from Dishonoured Cheque Issued for Business Loan.

The revision petitioner, K. Balasathiya Narayanan, filed a civil suit (O.S. No.176 of 2019) before the Principal District Court, Erode, against the fi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Revision Against Impleadment of Proprietor's Wife in Money Suit Under Order I Rule 10(2) CPC. Plaintiff's Objection That No Cause of Action Was Pleaded Against Proposed Party Does Not Bar Impleadment When Presence Is Necessary for Effective Adjudication.

The revision petitioner, K. Balasathiya Narayanan, filed a civil revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the orde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Declaration and Possession Suit — Substantial Question of Law Not Pressed. Amendment to plaint seeking both declaration and recovery of possession renders the framed question of law infructuous.

The case involves a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, filed by the appellant against the judgment and decree dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Demand for ₹215.75 Crores for Unlawful Mining of Iron Ore. Petitioner's Mining Lease Renewal Deemed Granted Under Section 8(3) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, and Extraction Was Lawful.

The petitioner, M/s Deepchand Kishenlal, a registered partnership firm, held a mining lease originally granted in 1954 for manganese ore and kaolin, w...