Search Results for "Reply Statement"

7047 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7047 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Petition by Apprentices Seeking Absorption as Regular Officers Under Apprentices Act, 1961. No Automatic Right to Absorption Exists Under Section 22(1) of the Act, and Employer Retains Discretion in Recruitment, with Writ Jurisdiction Limited to Policy Enforcement.

The petitioners, who were appointed as Graduate Apprentice Trainees by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (HPCL) in 2016-2017, filed a writ petition...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Determines Validity of Arbitrator's Interim Order Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act in MAPA Escrow Dispute. The Court Examines Whether the Order Preventing Parties from Proceeding Before Escrow Agents Was Justified.

The High Court of Bombay, in an arbitration petition under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, considered a challenge to an inte...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Case — Process Not Amounting to Manufacture Under Section 2(f) of Central Excise Act, 1944. Court Holds That Internal Order Deciding Jurisdiction Is Not Appealable Under Section 35 of the Act.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Haldia against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging GST Assessment Order for Violation of Natural Justice. Show Cause Notice and Assessment Order Found to Be Identical, Indicating Non-Application of Mind by Adjudicating Authority.

The petitioner, a private limited company, challenged an assessment order dated 31 March 2023 passed under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Service...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Mechanical Exercise of Power. Detenu's Right to Make Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Was Frustrated by Delayed Consideration and Failure to Supply Relevant Documents.

The petitioner, a friend of the detenu Mavin Keezhil Mohamed Aslam, filed a writ of habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Amendment of Plaint in Suit for Specific Performance. Amendment Seeking to Change Suit from Specific Performance to Declaration of Title and Possession Held Impermissible as It Introduces Inconsistent Case and Is Barred by Limitation.

The petitioners, original plaintiffs, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 01.08.1994 executed by the predecessor-in-ti...