Search Results for "1995 Act"

6807 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6807 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Domestic Violence Proceedings Against Husband and In-laws Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Complaint Filed at Pune While Shared Household Was in Hyderabad — Held That Jurisdiction Lies Where Cause of Action Arises, Not at Wife's Temporary Residence.

The petitioners, the husband and his parents, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the proceedings initiat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Entertainment Tax Demand Against Charity Show Organizer. Show for Blind Held Exempt Under Section 7 of Bombay Entertainments Duty Act, 1923; Recovery Barred by Limitation.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions challenging a common order/action by the State of Maharashtra to recover entertainment duty from the organize...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Applications in Rent Control Dispute — Licence vs. Lease Determination Under Bombay Rent Act, 1947. Agreement for use of shop premises held to be a lease, not a licence, based on exclusive possession and intention of parties.

The case involves two Civil Revision Applications filed by Messrs Miscellenary Marketers Pvt. Ltd. (defendants) against Messrs SunNSand Pvt. Ltd. (pla...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Considers Challenge to Land Acquisition Under BDA Act; Scheme for BTM Layout Allegedly Lapsed. Petitioners Sought Declaration That Acquisition Lapsed Under Section 27 of Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 Due to Failure to Substantially Implement Scheme.

The writ petition was filed before the Karnataka High Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by land owners whose property was ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Arbitration Petition Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Award of 14 January 2006 on Share Valuation Under Clause 7 of Protocol Agreement Challenged on Grounds of Jurisdiction and Legality of the Agreement.

The matter arose from a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by Western Maharashtra Development Corpn. Ltd. c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Setting Aside of Arbitral Award on Limitation Grounds. Court Holds That the Arbitrator's Finding on Limitation Was Not Perverse and Did Not Warrant Interference Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appeal arises from an order of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court setting aside an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration...