High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench Hears Group of Writ Petitions by University Employees. No adjudicative details available in the provided text.
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "reference procedure"
12200 result(s) found
Found 12200 result(s)
High Court
Gujarat High Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case, Upholds Additional Compensation for Dharoi Canal Project. Court Relies on Coordinate Bench Precedent for Same Village and Common Group, Finding No Ground to Interfere with Reference Court's Award.
18 Feb 2026The present appeal was filed by the State under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 read with Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908...
- 69
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Jurisdiction of Civil Court in Possession Dispute Involving Family Members. Section 33 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Held Not to Bar Suit as Tenancy Question Not Directly Arising.
16 Jun 2014The appeal before the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court arose from an order of a learned Single Judge deciding a preliminary issue of jurisdicti...
- 47
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Daughter's Claim in Land Acquisition Reference Despite Mutation Entry in Favor of Brother's Family. Court Holds Mutation Entry Not Conclusive of Title and Daughter Entitled to Share as Co-owner Under Hindu Succession Act, 1956.
22 Mar 2012The petitioner, Sakhubai @ Shakuntala V. Chopde, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Reference Court under Sections 30 and 31 of the La...
- 167
High Court
High Court Allows Petition Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for Appointment of Arbitrator in Construction Contract Dispute. Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator to Adjudicate Disputes Arising from Contract Dated 27.09.2013.
8 Dec 2017The petitioner, Sobha Projects and Trade Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking ...
- 42
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Sanction and Cognizance in UAPA Case — No Infirmity Found in Sanction Order or Cognizance Order. Court upholds validity of suo-motu sanction under Section 45(2) of UAPA and cognizance order under Section 120B IPC read with UAPA and CLA Act.
20 Sep 2024The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Fuleshwar Gope challenging the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court which refused to quash the sanctio...
- 838
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Sanction and Cognizance in UAPA Case — No Infirmity Found in Sanction Order or Cognizance Proceedings. The Court upheld the validity of the NIA's takeover of investigation and the sanction order under Section 45(2) UAPA, finding that the timeline for independent review is directory and the cognizance order was based on prima facie material.
20 Sep 2024The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Fuleshwar Gope challenging the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court which refused to quash the sanctio...
- 697
High Court
Karnataka High Court Hears Petition to Quash FIR Against Company and Director Over Tampered RFID E-Seals. Allegations Involved Offences Under IT Act and IPC for Submitting False Reports and Compromising Container Security.
17 Oct 2022The case stemmed from the Government of India's implementation of electronic sealing for containerized export cargo using RFID tamper‑proof e‑seal...
- 71
High Court
Karnataka High Court Examines Interpretation of Provisos to Section 10A(2)(b) of MMDR Act in Writ Petitions. Prospecting Licence Holders Seek Mandamus for Execution of Mining Leases Pending Environmental Clearance.
27 May 2022The High Court of Karnataka heard a group of four writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution by companies engaged in mining, seeking v...
- 48
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Reinstates Criminal Proceedings in Corruption Case Overturning High Court's Quashing of FIR. The Court held that authorization under Section 3 of J&K Prevention of Corruption Act, 2006 does not require a reasoned order, preliminary enquiry is permissible under Lalita Kumari, and the FIR disclosed cognizable offences of misappropriation under the Act.
29 Oct 2021The dispute arose from criminal proceedings initiated against the respondent, a government official, for alleged corruption in the purchase of medical...
- 274
