Search Results for "real and sufficient connection"

1240 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1240 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in SAFEMA Forfeiture Case — Notice to Convict Not Mandatory When Property Held by Relatives. The Court held that proceedings against relatives under Section 6 of SAFEMA are independent and do not require prior notice to the convict.

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals against a Madras High Court judgment that had set aside forfeiture orders under the Smugglers and Foreign Exc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction of Tenant for Unauthorised Permanent Construction Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act. Tenant's temporary structure argument rejected as Appellate Court found MS angles, asbestos sheets, and polythene roof constituted permanent construction causing danger to building.

The case involves a dispute between the respondent-landlord, Kadambagiri Estates Pvt. Ltd., and the petitioner-tenant, Mrs. Binaifer Batiwala, over ev...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Narhari Suryawanshi, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmedpur, for the murder of his nephew Laxman under Section 302 IP...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Acquittal under Section 498A IPC in Husband-Wife Case. Circumstantial evidence including last seen theory and motive sufficient to convict for murder under Section 302 IPC, but cruelty charge not proved.

The appellant, Yogesh Dinesh Bharadwaj, was convicted by the Second Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, in Sessions Case No.142 of 2004 for the murder o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Preventive Detention Order Beyond Three Months Under Preventive Detention Act, 1950. Interpretation of 'Such Detention' in Article 22(4)(a) of the Constitution Confirmed to Refer to Preventive Detention, Not Period of Detention.

The case involved a constitutional challenge to an order of preventive detention under the Preventive Detention Act, 1950, as amended. The appellant, ...