Search Results for "notice under CPC"

3639 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3639 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Lok Adalat Award for Lack of Valid Reference Under Section 20 of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987. Petitioner's Signature Obtained Without Proper Procedure Renders Award Void.

The petitioner, Madhukar Baburao Shete, a senior citizen with 95% physical disability, challenged an award passed by the Lok Adalat in Regular Civil S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petitioner to File Written Statement Beyond 90 Days in Partition Suit. Order VIII Rule 1 CPC Held Directory, Not Mandatory — Trial Court's Rejection Quashed on Payment of Costs.

The petitioner, Sri S. Indushekhar, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 25/11/202...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint in Summary Suit for Recovery of Money. Order 6 Rule 2(3) CPC does not require dates and sums in figures and words in plaint, and Order 37 Rule 2 CPC does not mandate separate verification.

The present Civil Revision Application was filed by the applicants (original defendants) against the order dated 07/11/2022 passed by the 14th Joint C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition Against Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Trust Property Suit. Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC Application Rejected as Plaint Disclosed Cause of Action and Was Not Barred by Law.

The petitioner, a defendant in a suit filed by the first respondent (a public trust), challenged the order dated 12.03.2015 passed by the II Additiona...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Execution Proceedings — Upholds Rejection of Application to Set Aside Auction Sale Under Order 21 Rule 90 CPC. Judgment-Debtor Failed to Prove Material Irregularity or Substantial Injury from Alleged Inadequacy of Price.

The case arises from execution proceedings in Ex. No. 73/2004 pending before the Civil Judge (Sr. Dn.), Chickmagalur. The appellants, who are the lega...