Search Results for "head constable"

1655 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1655 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder of Wife by Pouring Kerosene and Setting Her on Fire — Dying Declarations Consistent and Reliable.

The appellant, Prakash Maruti Mane, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, for the murder of his wife Shobha under Section 302 IPC a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Acquittal in Rash Driving Case — State Fails to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Accused's Version of Motorcycle Dashing Against Her Car Found Plausible, Benefit of Doubt Given.

The State appealed against the acquittal of the accused under Sections 279 and 337 IPC. The accident occurred on 5-2-2003 at Porvorim on the National ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Husband in Wife's Murder by Burning Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Dying Declarations Contradicted Each Other and Medical Evidence Did Not Support Prosecution Case.

The appellant, Nivrutti Tatyaba Ghadge, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati, Pune for the murder of his wife Mangal by burning, a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case — Demand for Bribe Not Proved. Acquittal of Head Constable under Section 161 IPC and Section 5(1)(d) read with 5(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 Upheld Due to Inconsistent Evidence.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 23/3/1990 passed by the Special Judge, Sangli in Special Case No.8 of 1986, whe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Inconsistent Testimonies. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Salim Kadar Inamdar, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ramesh Janardan Patil, was convicted by the learned II Additional Sessions Judge, Raigad Alibag in Sessions Case No.69 of 1992 for the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Motive. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Nafis Taufiq Shaikh, was convicted by the 5th Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, for the murder of his step-mother Parveen and half...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Compensation in Medical Negligence Case — State and Doctors Held Liable for Death Due to Negligent Sterilization Operation. Failure to Provide Adequate Post-Operative Care Amounts to Violation of Right to Health Under Article 21 of the Constitution.

The petitioners, Prabhabai and her husband Gullu @ Fulsingh Ragade, residents of Amgaon, Gondia, filed a writ petition seeking compensation for the de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Inconsistent Testimony. Conviction under Sections 302 and 498-A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand of dowry and homicidal death beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to the death of Megha, who was married to accused no.1 Surendra Chikte on 22.9.1994. The prosecution alleged that the accused, inclu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Talathi in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Inconsistent Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 5(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 and Section 161 IPC.

The appellant, Sharad s/o Namdeorao Shirbhate, a Talathi, was convicted by the Special Judge, Amravati in Special Case No.7 of 1988 for offences under...