Search Results for "expert witness"

1414 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1414 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The case involves an appeal against conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellants, Pandit Shankar Chaudhari and Subhash Kitk...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dacoity Case Due to Lack of Identification and Recovery. Conviction under Sections 395, 397, 457, 380, 342, 427 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove identity of accused and recovery of stolen articles.

The appellant, Polisha Ganpat Pawar, was convicted by the Vth Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik on April 12, 2002 in Sessions Case No.175 of 2001 for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Gang Rape Under Section 376(2)(c) IPC — Acquittal of Other Accused and Lesser Offences Upheld. Appellant's Conviction Based on Consistent Testimony of Victim and Medical Evidence, No Interference Warranted.

The case involves an appeal by accused No.1, Vasant Mahadeo Powar, against his conviction under Section 376(2)(c) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for g...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Appeals Against Conviction Under Sections 302/149, 147, 148, 427 IPC — Trial Court Had Sentenced Appellants to Life Imprisonment. Appellants Challenged Conviction Based on Alleged Assault with Deadly Weapons Leading to Death.

This matter involved two criminal appeals and a bail application arising from the same judgment of the trial court. The appellants were original accus...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal of Accused Convicted Under Section 302 IPC Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction Set Aside as Motive, Last Seen, Recovery Evidence and Dog Tracking Held Unreliable, Failing to Establish Complete Chain of Circumstances Pointing to Guilt.

This appeal arose from the conviction of the accused, a 24-year-old villager, under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 by the Additional Sessi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Gift Deed in Ancestral Property Dispute — Property Devised by Will Held Self-Acquired. Gift Deed Valid as Execution Not Specifically Denied, No Attesting Witness Required Under Section 68 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

The present appeal arises from a second appeal before the Gujarat High Court concerning a gift deed executed by Chhotabhai Ashabhai Patel (donor) on N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Uncle for Murder of Infant in Property Dispute. Appellant convicted under Section 302 IPC for snatching and dashing 1.5-year-old child on cement floor, causing fatal head injury.

The appellant, Mukund Digambar Dixit, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for the murder of his 1.5-year-old nephew. The in...